Comment on "Left-Handed Materials Do Not Make a Perfect Lens"
J.B. Pendry

TL;DR
This paper refutes claims that perfect lensing solutions are physically impossible due to absorption, demonstrating that with proper absorption considerations, solutions remain well-behaved and can approach perfect resolution.
Contribution
It provides a counter-argument showing that absorption does not necessarily prevent perfect lensing, contrary to previous claims, and that solutions evolve smoothly to ideal focusing.
Findings
Solutions are well-behaved with finite absorption.
Absorption leads to smooth evolution towards perfect resolution.
No catastrophic collapse occurs due to absorption.
Abstract
In a recent Physical Review Letter [1] Garcia and Nieto Vesperinas (GNV) dispute the claim of perfect lensing made in [2]. The thrust of the GVN paper is that the solutions proposed in [2] imply infinite energy density and are therefore inadmissible. They claim that finite absorption leads to catastrophic collapse of the amplifying solutions vital to focussing and that no useful effect can be achieved. In this Comment I show that, on the contrary, careful consideration of absorption results in solutions that are always well behaved and evolve smoothly and continuously to perfect resolution in the limiting case of zero absorption.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
