Comment on "Dynamic correlations of the spinless Coulomb Luttinger liquid [Phys. Rev. B {\bf 65}, 125109 (2002)]"
D. W. Wang, A. J. Millis, and S. Das Sarma

TL;DR
This paper critiques a previous study on Coulomb Luttinger liquids, arguing that its mathematical analysis was flawed and that its conclusions about dynamical correlations are probably incorrect.
Contribution
It provides a critical review and correction of the mathematical analysis and conclusions in the prior work on Coulomb Luttinger liquids.
Findings
Previous claims about threshold behavior are based on inconsistent analysis
Physical arguments suggest the claimed behavior is unlikely to be correct
Highlights the importance of correct mathematical treatment in Luttinger liquid studies
Abstract
We show that claims, presented in Phys. Rev. B {\bf 65}, 125109 (2002) concerning the threshold behavior of dynamical correlations of a Coulomb Luttinger liquid, are based on an inconsistent mathematical analysis. Physical arguments are also presented, indicating that the claimed behavior is unlikely to be correct.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
