The difference between Si and Ge(001) surfaces in the initial stages of growth
G. Brocks, J.H. Snoeijer, P. J. Kelly, H. J. W. Zandvliet, and Bene, Poelsema

TL;DR
This study compares the initial epitaxial growth stages of Ge and Si on their respective (001) surfaces, revealing directional differences in metastable ad-dimer rows that influence growth behavior due to chemical differences.
Contribution
It uncovers the directional preferences of metastable ad-dimer rows on Ge(001) versus Si(001), highlighting the impact of elemental chemistry on epitaxial growth.
Findings
Ge(001) rows are exclusively in <310> directions
Si(001) rows prefer <110> directions
Differences are due to chemical properties of Ge and Si
Abstract
The initial stages of growth of Ge and Si on the Ge(001) surface are studied and compared to growth on the Si(001) surface. Metastable rows of diluted ad-dimers exist on both surfaces as intermediate stages of epitaxial growth. Unexpectedly, for Ge(001) these rows are found exclusively in the <310> directions, whereas on Si(001) the preferred direction is <110>. This qualitative difference between Si and Ge surfaces reflects the subtle difference in the chemistry of these two elements, which has direct consequences for epitaxial growth on these surfaces.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsOptical Coatings and Gratings · Photonic and Optical Devices · Semiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices
