Anchoring a Lexicalized Tree-Adjoining Grammar for Discourse
Bonnie Lynn Webber, Aravind K. Joshi (University of Pennsylvania)

TL;DR
This paper proposes a lexicalized Tree-Adjoining Grammar framework for discourse, modeling larger discourse structures anchored on cues, integrating compositional, presuppositional, and inferential semantics.
Contribution
It introduces a fully lexicalized grammar for discourse that links intra-sentential structures with discourse cues, offering a unified account of discourse meaning.
Findings
Different discourse cue patterns are explained by distinct structures and operations.
The framework integrates compositional, presuppositional, and inferential semantics.
It accounts for various discourse phenomena through structured, cue-based analysis.
Abstract
We here explore a ``fully'' lexicalized Tree-Adjoining Grammar for discourse that takes the basic elements of a (monologic) discourse to be not simply clauses, but larger structures that are anchored on variously realized discourse cues. This link with intra-sentential grammar suggests an account for different patterns of discourse cues, while the different structures and operations suggest three separate sources for elements of discourse meaning: (1) a compositional semantics tied to the basic trees and operations; (2) a presuppositional semantics carried by cue phrases that freely adjoin to trees; and (3) general inference, that draws additional, defeasible conclusions that flesh out what is conveyed compositionally.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSyntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation · Language, Metaphor, and Cognition · Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
