Automatic summarising: factors and directions
Karen Sparck Jones (Computer Laboratory, University of Cambridge)

TL;DR
This paper emphasizes the need for a focused research methodology in automatic summarising, highlighting the importance of context factors and advocating for a strategy centered on shallow analysis and indicative summarising.
Contribution
It analyzes key context factors affecting summarising and evaluation, proposing a strategic shift towards shallow analysis and indicative summarising for more effective progress.
Findings
Analysis of context factors influences summarising strategies
Advocates for shallow, indicative summarising approaches
Proposes a research program based on current work
Abstract
This position paper suggests that progress with automatic summarising demands a better research methodology and a carefully focussed research strategy. In order to develop effective procedures it is necessary to identify and respond to the context factors, i.e. input, purpose, and output factors, that bear on summarising and its evaluation. The paper analyses and illustrates these factors and their implications for evaluation. It then argues that this analysis, together with the state of the art and the intrinsic difficulty of summarising, imply a nearer-term strategy concentrating on shallow, but not surface, text analysis and on indicative summarising. This is illustrated with current work, from which a potentially productive research programme can be developed.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsTopic Modeling · Natural Language Processing Techniques · Advanced Text Analysis Techniques
