An Implemented Formalism for Computing Linguistic Presuppositions and Existential Commitments
Daniel Marcu, Graeme Hirst (University of Toronto)

TL;DR
This paper presents a formal logical framework combining linguistic and philosophical insights to computationally determine presuppositions and existential commitments in language.
Contribution
It introduces a unified formalism that integrates Meinong's philosophy and Grice's principles within stratified logic for computing presuppositions.
Findings
Provides a tractable computational method for presupposition calculation
Unifies presupposition and existential commitment analysis
Uses a rich ontology and philosophical principles
Abstract
We rely on the strength of linguistic and philosophical perspectives in constructing a framework that offers a unified explanation for presuppositions and existential commitment. We use a rich ontology and a set of methodological principles that embed the essence of Meinong's philosophy and Grice's conversational principles into a stratified logic, under an unrestricted interpretation of the quantifiers. The result is a logical formalism that yields a tractable computational method that uniformly calculates all the presuppositions of a given utterance, including the existential ones.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsLogic, Reasoning, and Knowledge · Semantic Web and Ontologies · Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation
