On Reasoning with Ambiguities
Uwe Reyle (Institute for Computational Linguistics, University of, Stuttgart)

TL;DR
This paper introduces semantic representations that handle ambiguities in reasoning by leaving scope relations unspecified, providing truth conditions and inference patterns that operate directly on these underspecified structures.
Contribution
It presents a novel approach to reasoning with ambiguities using underspecified semantic representations and inference patterns that do not require disambiguation.
Findings
Semantic representations with unspecified scope relations are feasible.
Truth conditions for these representations are established.
Inference patterns operate directly on underspecified structures.
Abstract
The paper adresses the problem of reasoning with ambiguities. Semantic representations are presented that leave scope relations between quantifiers and/or other operators unspecified. Truth conditions are provided for these representations and different consequence relations are judged on the basis of intuitive correctness. Finally inference patterns are presented that operate directly on these underspecified structures, i.e. do not rely on any translation into the set of their disambiguations.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSemantic Web and Ontologies · Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge · Rough Sets and Fuzzy Logic
