A Deductive Account of Quantification in LFG
Mary Dalrymple (Xerox PARC, Palo Alto CA), John Lamping (Xerox PARC,, Palo Alto CA), Fernando Pereira (AT&T Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill NJ),, Vijay Saraswat (Xerox PARC, Palo Alto CA)

TL;DR
This paper presents a deductive, logic-based framework using linear logic and LFG to analyze quantifier scope and anaphora, offering a direct, computationally flexible approach that avoids additional mechanisms like Cooper storage.
Contribution
It introduces a novel deductive approach combining LFG and linear logic to model quantifier scope without extra mechanisms, enhancing computational flexibility.
Findings
Correctly models quantifier scope interactions
Provides a direct logical representation of quantifiers
Preliminary Prolog implementation developed
Abstract
The relationship between Lexical-Functional Grammar (LFG) functional structures (f-structures) for sentences and their semantic interpretations can be expressed directly in a fragment of linear logic in a way that explains correctly the constrained interactions between quantifier scope ambiguity and bound anaphora. The use of a deductive framework to account for the compositional properties of quantifying expressions in natural language obviates the need for additional mechanisms, such as Cooper storage, to represent the different scopes that a quantifier might take. Instead, the semantic contribution of a quantifier is recorded as an ordinary logical formula, one whose use in a proof will establish the scope of the quantifier. The properties of linear logic ensure that each quantifier is scoped exactly once. Our analysis of quantifier scope can be seen as a recasting of Pereira's…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsNatural Language Processing Techniques · Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge · Logic, programming, and type systems
