Homoclinic splitting, II. A possible counterexample to a claim by Rudnev and Wiggins on Physica D
G. Gallavotti, G. Gentile, V. Mastropietro (Universita' di Roma 1,2,3)
TL;DR
This paper questions the validity of previous results on homoclinic splitting, suggesting a potential counterexample to claims made by Rudnev and Wiggins, thereby challenging existing assumptions in the field.
Contribution
It provides a critical analysis that disputes prior findings, proposing a possible counterexample to the claims by Rudnev and Wiggins.
Findings
Previous results may be invalid
Potential counterexample identified
Challenges existing assumptions in homoclinic splitting
Abstract
Results in the mentioned paper do not seem valid.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMental Health Research Topics · Quantum Mechanics and Applications