Using neutron stars and primordial black holes to test theories of quantum gravity
Lee Smolin

TL;DR
This paper discusses three observational tests related to cosmological natural selection, a theory linked to quantum gravity, and evaluates their potential to refute the theory based on current and future astronomical observations.
Contribution
It introduces three observational tests for cosmological natural selection and assesses their effectiveness in falsifying the theory.
Findings
A pulsar with mass > 2.5 solar masses could refute the theory
Current knowledge does not refute the theory
Future observations of primordial black holes may test the theory
Abstract
Three observational tests of cosmological natural selection, a theory that follows from some hypotheses about quantum gravity, are described. If true, this theory explains the choices of the parameters of the standard model of particle physics. The first, the observation of a pulsar with mass greater than , would cleanly refute the theory. The second and third, having to do with primordial black holes and early massive star formation, could do so given likely developments in the near future. However given present knowledge these arguments do not presently refute the theory. This shows that cosmological natural selection has not so far been refuted, in spite of being very vulnerable to falsification by possible observations.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsCosmology and Gravitation Theories · Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories · Relativity and Gravitational Theory
