The Variable Light Curve of GRB 030329: The Case for Refreshed Shocks

TL;DR

GRB 030329's variable light curve is best explained by refreshed shocks, which reconcile its low initial energy and observed fluctuations, confirming the importance of late-time shell interactions in GRB afterglows.

Contribution

This paper provides evidence that refreshed shocks are the primary cause of variability in GRB 030329's afterglow, linking late shell ejections to observed light curve features.

Findings

Refreshed shocks explain the light curve variability.

The total energy output is increased by a factor of ~10 due to refreshed shocks.

GRB 030329's properties support the refreshed shock model.

Abstract

GRB 030329 is unique in many aspects. It has a very low redshift for a GRB, $z=0.1685$, and is therefore very bright and easy to monitor, making it the most well studied afterglow to date. It shows a supernova bump in the light curve, with a spectrum very similar to SN 1998bw, thus establishing with much better confidence the connection between GRBs and core collapse SNe. There are also two important physical characteristics that make this burst especially interesting, aside from its remarkably low redshift. First, unlike most GRB afterglows, the light curve of GRB 030329 shows a very large variability a few days after the burst. These fluctuations show a roughly constact amplitude, and a constant duration $\Delta t$, while $\Delta t/t$ decreases with time $t$. Second, its $\gamma$-ray energy output and X-ray luminosity at $10 $hr are a factor of $\sim 20$ and $\sim 30$, respectively, below the average value around which most GRBs are narrowly clustered. We consider several interpretations for the variability in the light curve, in the context of different physical mechanisms, and find that the most likely cause is refreshed shocks, i.e. slow shells that are ejected from the source and catch up with the afterglow shock at late times. In GRB 030329 this happens after the jet break, which implies an approximately constant duration $\Delta t$ of the bumps, in agreement with the observations. This interpretation also explains the anomalously low initial energy of this burst, as the total energy of the afterglow shock is increased by a factor of $\sim 10$ due to the refreshed shocks, thus bringing the total energy output close to the average value for all GRBs.