On the Binding Energy Parameter of Common Envelope Evolution. Dependency on the Definition of the Stellar Core Boundary during Spiral-in

TL;DR

This paper investigates how the definition of the stellar core boundary affects the calculation of the binding energy parameter lambda during common envelope evolution, impacting predictions of post-CE orbital separations.

Contribution

It compares multiple methods for defining the core boundary in evolved stars and assesses their impact on lambda, highlighting the importance of core boundary choice in binary evolution models.

Findings

Different core boundary definitions significantly affect lambda values.

Entropy profile method is not suitable for RGB stars due to convective boundary issues.

Good agreement among methods for AGB stars, except for very massive stars.

Abstract

According to the standard picture for binary interactions, the outcome of binaries surviving the evolution through a common envelope (CE) and spiral-in phase is determined by the internal structure of the donor star at the onset of the mass transfer, as well as the poorly-known efficiency parameter, eta_CE}, for the ejection of the H-envelope of the donor. In this Research Note we discuss the bifurcation point which separates the ejected, unprocessed H-rich material from the inner core region of the donor (the central part of the star which will later contract to form a compact object). We demonstrate that the exact location of this point is very important for evaluating the binding energy parameter, lambda, which is used to determine the post-CE orbital separation. Here we compare various methods to define the bifurcation point (core/envelope boundary) of evolved stars with masses 4, 7, 10 and 20 M_sun. We consider the specific nuclear energy production rate profile, the change in the mass-density gradient (Bisscheroux 1998), the inner region containing less than 10% hydrogen, the method suggested by Han et al. (1994) and the entropy profile. We also calculated effective polytropic index profiles. The entropy profile method measures the convective boundary (at the onset of flatness in the specific entropy) which is not equivalent to the core boundary for RGB stars. Hence, this method is not applicable for RGB stars, unless the actual bifurcation point of a CE is located at the bottom of the outer convection zone (resulting in larger values of lambda and larger post-CE orbital separations). On the AGB, where highly degenerate and condensed cores are formed, we find good agreement between the various methods, except for massive (20 M_sun) stars.