# GNAQ and GNA11 Genes: A Comprehensive Review on Oncogenesis, Prognosis and Therapeutic Opportunities in Uveal Melanoma

## TL;DR

This paper reviews the role of GNAQ and GNA11 genes in uveal melanoma, focusing on their impact on cancer development, prognosis, and potential for targeted therapies.

## Contribution

The paper provides a comprehensive review of the oncogenic, prognostic, and therapeutic relevance of GNAQ and GNA11 mutations in uveal melanoma.

## Key findings

- GNAQ and GNA11 are mutated in 80–90% of uveal melanomas and drive oncogenesis.
- Mutations in these genes activate signaling pathways like phospholipase C and YAP transcription factor.
- The prognostic role of GNAQ and GNA11 mutations remains controversial and requires further study.

## Abstract

The development of uveal melanoma is a multifactorial and multi-step process, in which specific and recurrent mutations arise early. Among the recurrently mutated genes, GNAQ and GNA11 are involved in the process of carcinogenesis and are mutated in 80–90% of these tumours. Historically, there has been speculation as to whether these two genes are involved in the progression of primary uveal melanoma to metastatic disease, in addition to the oncogenic process itself. For this reason, both genes have been the subject of multiple research studies. Additionally, due to their high mutation rate in uveal melanoma, these genes and the downstream signaling pathways in which they are involved have been postulated as interesting therapeutic targets. This review aims to provide a current comprehensive view of what we know about GNAQ and GNA11 genes on oncogenesis, prognosis and therapeutic opportunities in uveal melanoma.

The GNAQ and GNA11 genes are mutated in almost 80–90% of uveal melanomas in a mutually exclusive pattern. These genes encode the alpha subunits of the heterotrimeric G proteins, Gq and G11; thus, mutations of these genes result in the activation of several important signaling pathways, including phospholipase C, and activation of the transcription factor YAP. It is well known that both of them act as driver genes in the oncogenic process and it has been assumed that they do not play a role in the prognosis of these tumours. However, it has been hypothesised that mutations in these genes could give rise to molecularly and clinically distinct types of uveal melanomas. It has also been questioned whether the type and location of mutation in the GNAQ and GNA11 genes may affect the progression of these tumours. All of these questions, except for their implications in carcinogenesis, remain controversial. Uveal melanoma has a distinctive genetic profile, and specific recurrent mutations, which make it a potential candidate for treatment with targeted therapy. Given that the most frequent mutations are those observed in the GNAQ and GNA11 genes, and that both genes are involved in oncogenesis, these molecules, as well as the downstream signalling pathways in which they are involved, have been proposed as promising potential therapeutic targets. Therefore, in this review, special attention is paid to the current data related to the possible prognostic implications of both genes from different perspectives, as well as the therapeutic options targeting them.