# Antimicrobial use in agriculture: critical review of the factors influencing behaviour

**Authors:** C McKernan, T Benson, S Farrell, M Dean

PMC · DOI: 10.1093/jacamr/dlab178 · JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance · 2021-11-30

## TL;DR

This review explores the factors influencing antimicrobial use in agriculture, aiming to identify psychosocial aspects that can help reduce misuse and combat antimicrobial resistance.

## Contribution

The study provides a comprehensive analysis of psychosocial factors affecting antimicrobial use behavior among farmers and veterinarians.

## Key findings

- Five key themes were identified: knowledge, attitudes, relationships, resources, and factors influencing antimicrobial use.
- Behavior change interventions must incorporate psychosocial factors and evidence-based strategies to be effective.
- Stakeholders face barriers that require tailored, theory-informed approaches for sustainable behavior change.

## Abstract

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a global health emergency affecting humans and animals, diminishing the effectiveness of medication used to treat illness. The agri-food sector has attracted increased attention for imprudent antimicrobial use (AMU) and its contribution to AMR. Thus, ascertaining farmers’ and veterinarians’ behaviours surrounding AMU is essential to address imprudent AMU and generate behaviour change within the agri-food sector. Therefore, the aim of this critical review is to investigate, assess and collate the current body of evidence to identify psychosocial factors including knowledge, understanding, perceptions, attitudes and behaviours surrounding AMU. Database searches were limited to articles utilizing qualitative and quantitative methodologies, available in English with no restriction on publication year. Of the 1156 articles identified, 103 were retained for this review. Findings on the psychosocial aspects were thematically analysed. Five key themes emerged from the data: (i) knowledge and awareness of antimicrobials; (ii) attitudes towards antimicrobials; (iii) influential relationships; (iv) resources; and (v) factors influencing AMU. Results indicated that to overcome barriers experienced by key stakeholders, a carefully considered, evidence-based approach, incorporating behaviour change theory, is required when designing intricate interventions/strategies, in order to elicit successful and sustained AMU behaviour change.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** HP-CIAs (MESH:D016638), dry cow (MESH:D015605), microbial infections (MESH:D015163), AMU (MESH:D019966), infection (MESH:D007239), AMR (MESH:D060467), mastitis (MESH:D008413)
- **Chemicals:** AMU (-)
- **Species:** Sus scrofa (pig, species) [taxon 9823], Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606], Bos taurus (bovine, species) [taxon 9913], Ovis aries (domestic sheep, species) [taxon 9940], Gallus gallus (bantam, species) [taxon 9031]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC8634307/full.md

## Figures

2 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC8634307/full.md

## References

124 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC8634307/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC8634307