# Current Pretreatment/Cell Disruption and Extraction Methods Used to Improve Intracellular Lipid Recovery from Oleaginous Yeasts

**Authors:** Muhammad Fakhri Zainuddin, Chong Kar Fai, Arbakariya B. Ariff, Leonardo Rios-Solis, Murni Halim

PMC · DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms9020251 · Microorganisms · 2021-01-27

## TL;DR

This review discusses methods to improve lipid recovery from oleaginous yeasts by comparing pretreatment and extraction techniques.

## Contribution

The paper systematically evaluates current and emerging methods for lipid recovery from oleaginous yeasts.

## Key findings

- Mechanical and nonmechanical methods vary in efficiency for different yeast species.
- Conventional and green solvents have different impacts on lipid yield.
- Emerging methods like supercritical fluid extraction show promise for lipid recovery.

## Abstract

The production of lipids from oleaginous yeasts involves several stages starting from cultivation and lipid accumulation, biomass harvesting and finally lipids extraction. However, the complex and relatively resistant cell wall of yeasts limits the full recovery of intracellular lipids and usually solvent extraction is not sufficient to effectively extract the lipid bodies. A pretreatment or cell disruption method is hence a prerequisite prior to solvent extraction. In general, there are no recovery methods that are equally efficient for different species of oleaginous yeasts. Each method adopts different mechanisms to disrupt cells and extract the lipids, thus a systematic evaluation is essential before choosing a particular method. In this review, mechanical (bead mill, ultrasonication, homogenization and microwave) and nonmechanical (enzyme, acid, base digestions and osmotic shock) methods that are currently used for the disruption or permeabilization of oleaginous yeasts are discussed based on their principle, application and feasibility, including their effects on the lipid yield. The attempts of using conventional and “green” solvents to selectively extract lipids are compared. Other emerging methods such as automated pressurized liquid extraction, supercritical fluid extraction and simultaneous in situ lipid recovery using capturing agents are also reviewed to facilitate the choice of more effective lipid recovery methods.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** Osmotic Shock (MESH:D012769), HAP (MESH:D004618), dehydration (MESH:D003681), respiratory deficient (MESH:D012131), toxicity (MESH:D064420), carcinogenic chemical (MESH:D019966)
- **Species:** Lipomyces kononenkoae (species) [taxon 34357], Rhodotorula glutinis (species) [taxon 5535], Geotrichum (genus) [taxon 43987], Carica papaya (mamon, species) [taxon 3649], Cutaneotrichosporon oleaginosum (species) [taxon 879819], Meyerozyma guilliermondii (species) [taxon 4929], Yarrowia lipolytica (species) [taxon 4952], Saccharomyces cerevisiae (baker's yeast, species) [taxon 4932], Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606], Rhodotorula kratochvilovae (species) [taxon 86836], [Candida] sp. (species) [taxon 1853550], Cutaneotrichosporon curvatum (species) [taxon 57679], Apiotrichum porosum (species) [taxon 105984], Solicoccozyma terricola (species) [taxon 104414], Chlorella sorokiniana (species) [taxon 3076], activated sludge metagenome (species) [taxon 942017], Rhodotorula toruloides (species) [taxon 5286], Trichosporon sp. (species) [taxon 1856742], Apiotrichum mycotoxinovorans (species) [taxon 252803], Williopsis jadinii (species) [taxon 4903], Lipomyces starkeyi (species) [taxon 29829], PX clade (clade) [taxon 569578], Bacteria Latreille et al. 1825 (Bacteria stick insect, genus) [taxon 629395], Scheffersomyces stipitis (species) [taxon 4924]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC7910848/full.md

## References

152 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC7910848/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC7910848