Evaluation of nutritional and economic feed values of spent coffee grounds and Artemisia princeps residues as a ruminant feed using in vitro ruminal fermentation
Jakyeom Seo, Jae Keun Jung, Seongwon Seo

TL;DR
This study explores using spent coffee grounds and Japanese mugwort residues as cost-effective, alternative ruminant feed ingredients.
Contribution
The novelty lies in evaluating the nutritional and economic viability of spent coffee grounds and mugwort residues, with and without pre-fermentation, as ruminant feed.
Findings
Spent coffee grounds and mugwort residues are economically viable as alternative feed ingredients.
Pre-fermentation did not significantly improve digestibility or gas production, despite slightly increasing NDF digestibility for mugwort residues.
Fermented mugwort residues increased feed costs, making them less economically favorable.
Abstract
Much research on animal feed has focused on finding alternative feed ingredients that can replace conventional ones (e.g., grains and beans) to reduce feed costs. The objective of this study was to evaluate the economic, as well as nutritional value of spent coffee grounds (SCG) and Japanese mugwort (Artemisia princeps) residues (APR) as alternative feed ingredients for ruminants. We also investigated whether pre-fermentation using Lactobacillus spp. was a feasible way to increase the feed value of these by-products. Chemical analyses and an in vitro study were conducted for SCG, APR, and their pre-fermented forms. All the experimental diets for in vitro ruminal fermentation were formulated to contain a similar composition of crude protein, neutral detergent fiber and total digestible nutrients at 1x maintenance feed intake based on the dairy National Research Council (NRC). The control…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsChemistry and Stereochemistry Studies
