# Contacts with out-of-hours primary care for nonurgent problems: patients’ beliefs or deficiencies in healthcare?

**Authors:** Ellen Keizer, Marleen Smits, Yvonne Peters, Linda Huibers, Paul Giesen, Michel Wensing

PMC · DOI: 10.1186/s12875-015-0376-9 · 2015-10-28

## TL;DR

This study explores why patients in the Netherlands contact out-of-hours care for nonurgent issues, finding that patient beliefs and healthcare access issues both play a role.

## Contribution

The study identifies patient characteristics and healthcare system factors linked to nonurgent use of out-of-hours primary care.

## Key findings

- 30.4% of nonurgent contacts were judged medically necessary.
- Patients with unnecessary contacts were younger, frequent attenders, and more likely to believe GPs are for all help requests.
- Worry was the main motive for unnecessary contacts, while perceived need drove necessary ones.

## Abstract

In the Netherlands, about half of the patient contacts with a general practitioner (GP) cooperative are nonurgent from a medical perspective. A part of these problems can wait until office hours or can be managed by the patient himself without further professional care. However, from the patient’s perspective, there may be a need to contact a physician immediately. Our objective was to determine whether contacts with out-of-hours primary care made by patients with nonurgent problems are the result of patients’ beliefs or of deficiencies in the healthcare system.

We performed a survey among 2000 patients with nonurgent health problems in four GP cooperatives in the Netherlands. Two GPs independently judged the medical necessity of the contacts of all patients in this study. We examined characteristics, views and motives of patients with medically necessary contacts and those without medically necessary contacts. Descriptive statistics were used to describe the characteristics, views and reasons of the patients with medically unnecessary contacts and medically necessary contacts. Differences between these groups were tested with chi-square tests.

The response rate was 32.3 % (N = 646). Of the nonurgent contacts 30.4 % were judged as medically necessary (95 % CI 27.0-34.2). Compared to patients with nonurgent but medically necessary contacts, patients with medically unnecessary contacts were younger and were more often frequent attenders. They had longer-existing problems, lower self-assessed urgency, and more often believed GP cooperatives are intended for all help requests. Worry was the most frequently mentioned motive for contacting a GP cooperative for patients with a medically unnecessary contact (45.3 %) and a perceived need to see a GP for patients with a medically necessary contact (44.2 %). Perceived availability (5.8 %) and accessibility (8.3 %) of a patient’s own GP played a role for some patients.

Motives for contacting a GP cooperative are mostly patient-related, but also deficiencies in access to general practice may partly explain medically unnecessary use. Efforts to change the use of GP cooperatives should focus on education of subgroups with an increased likelihood of contact for medically unnecessary problems. Improvement of access to daytime primary care may also decrease use of the GP cooperative.

## Full-text entities

- **Genes:** RNF130 (ring finger protein 130) [NCBI Gene 55819] {aka G1RP, G1RZFP, GOLIATH, GP}
- **Diseases:** insect bite (MESH:D007299), cystitis (MESH:D003556), anxiety (MESH:D001007)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC4625560