# Evaluation of the Broad-Range PCR/ESI-MS Technology in Blood Specimens for the Molecular Diagnosis of Bloodstream Infections

**Authors:** Elena Jordana-Lluch, Montserrat Giménez, Mª Dolores Quesada, Belén Rivaya, Clara Marcó, Mª Jesús Domínguez, Fernando Arméstar, Elisa Martró, Vicente Ausina

PMC · DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0140865 · 2015-10-16

## TL;DR

This study evaluates a new molecular diagnostic tool for identifying bloodstream infections, showing it can detect pathogens faster than traditional methods, especially in ICU patients.

## Contribution

The study introduces and validates a PCR/ESI-MS platform for rapid pathogen detection in blood, demonstrating its potential in clinical settings.

## Key findings

- IRIDICA detected 41 clinically significant microorganisms missed by traditional blood culture methods.
- The technology showed higher sensitivity and specificity when compared to clinical infection criteria rather than blood culture alone.
- It identified rare pathogens like Mycoplasma hominis and Mycobacterium simiae in immunocompromised patients.

## Abstract

Rapid identification of the etiological agent in bloodstream infections is of vital importance for the early administration of the most appropriate antibiotic therapy. Molecular methods may offer an advantage to current culture-based microbiological diagnosis. The goal of this study was to evaluate the performance of IRIDICA, a platform based on universal genetic amplification followed by mass spectrometry (PCR/ESI-MS) for the molecular diagnosis of sepsis-related pathogens directly from the patient’s blood.

A total of 410 whole blood specimens from patients admitted to Emergency Room (ER) and Intensive Care Unit (ICU) with clinical suspicion of sepsis were tested with the IRIDICA BAC BSI Assay (broad identification of bacteria and Candida spp.). Microorganisms grown in culture and detected by IRIDICA were compared considering blood culture as gold standard. When discrepancies were found, clinical records and results from other cultures were taken into consideration (clinical infection criterion).

The overall positive and negative agreement of IRIDICA with blood culture in the analysis by specimen was 74.8% and 78.6%, respectively, rising to 76.9% and 87.2% respectively, when compared with the clinical infection criterion. Interestingly, IRIDICA detected 41 clinically significant microorganisms missed by culture, most of them from patients under antimicrobial treatment. Of special interest were the detections of one Mycoplasma hominis and two Mycobacterium simiae in immunocompromised patients. When ICU patients were analyzed separately, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values compared with blood culture were 83.3%, 78.6%, 33.9% and 97.3% respectively, and 90.5%, 87.2%, 64.4% and 97.3% respectively, in comparison with the clinical infection criterion.

IRIDICA is a promising technology that offers an early and reliable identification of a wide variety of pathogens directly from the patient’s blood within 6h, which brings the opportunity to improve management of septic patients, especially for those critically ill admitted to the ICU.

## Linked entities

- **Species:** Mycobacterium simiae (taxon 1784)

## Full-text entities

- **Genes:** vanB [NCBI Gene 6779647], vanS [NCBI Gene 4783149], vanR. [NCBI Gene 10164673], vanA [NCBI Gene 13874695]
- **Diseases:** septic shock (MESH:D012772), ICU (MESH:C000657744), fever (MESH:D005334), aspergillosis (MESH:D001228), septic (MESH:D001170), infection (MESH:D007239), -negative staphylococci (MESH:D064726), Bloodstream Infections (MESH:D018805), nosocomial infections (MESH:D003428), critically ill (MESH:D016638), immunological impairment (MESH:D007154)
- **Chemicals:** Carbapenems (MESH:D015780), Vancomycin (MESH:D014640), galactomannan (MESH:C012990), Teicoplanin (MESH:D017334), methicillin (MESH:D008712), Methicillin Coagulase-negative staphylococci (-), EDTA (MESH:D004492),  (MESH:D000900)
- **Species:** Cutibacterium acnes (species) [taxon 1747], Lodderomyces parapsilosis (species) [taxon 5480], Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (species) [taxon 40324], Staphylococcus haemolyticus (species) [taxon 1283], Nakaseomyces glabratus (species) [taxon 5478], Streptococcus viridans (species) [taxon 78535], Debaryomyces hansenii (species) [taxon 4959], Mycobacterium simiae (species) [taxon 1784], Escherichia coli (E. coli, species) [taxon 562], Streptococcus pneumoniae (species) [taxon 1313], Candida albicans (species) [taxon 5476], Haemophilus influenzae (species) [taxon 727], Enterobacter cloacae (species) [taxon 550], Staphylococcus aureus (species) [taxon 1280], Listeria monocytogenes (species) [taxon 1639], Streptococcus gallolyticus (species) [taxon 315405], Acinetobacter baumannii (species) [taxon 470], Aspergillus fumigatus (species) [taxon 746128], Bacteria Latreille et al. 1825 (Bacteria stick insect, genus) [taxon 629395], Enterococcus faecium (species) [taxon 1352], Proteus mirabilis (species) [taxon 584], Candida tropicalis (species) [taxon 5482], Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606], Metamycoplasma hominis (species) [taxon 2098], Staphylococcus epidermidis (species) [taxon 1282], Pseudomonas putida (species) [taxon 303], Klebsiella pneumoniae (species) [taxon 573]

## Figures

5 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC4608784/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC4608784