
Abstract
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSpatial Neglect and Hemispheric Dysfunction · Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms · Older Adults Driving Studies
Keir X. X. Yong, Timothy J. Shakespeare, Dave Cash, Susie M. D. Henley, Jennifer M. Nicholas, Gerard R. Ridgway, Hannah L. Golden, Elizabeth K. Warrington, Amelia M. Carton, Diego Kaski, Jonathan M. Schott, Jason D. Warren, Sebastian J. Crutch. Prominent effects and neural correlates of visual crowding in a neurodegenerative disease population. Brain 2014; 137: 3284–99; doi:10.1093/brain/awu293.
This article has been corrected online and is available at brain.oxfordjournals.org.
The publishers would like to apologise for an error introduced during copyediting into the paper by Yong et al. On page 3286, the tasks listed under the heading ‘Crowding assessment’ should read as follows:
Task 1: Unflanked letter identification
The target stimuli (n = 20) were alphabetic items presented in isolation. Letters were presented in random order for 6000 ms in a fixation box (3.2° in width, 2.9° in height) at the centre of the screen.
In each of the following tasks (Tasks 2–6), target letter identification was probed under two spatial conditions, condensed and spaced.
Task 2: Letter flankers
Target letters (n = 24) were flanked on each side by a letter, forming a 3-letter non-word combination.
Task 3: Shape flankers
Target letters (n = 24) were flanked on each side by a triangle presented at different orientations. Triangles were of equal height and line thickness to target letters.
Task 4: Number flankers
Target letters (n = 24) were flanked on each side by an Arabic numeral, chosen from a range between 2 and 9.
Task 5: Same-polarity flankers
Target letters (n = 24) were flanked on each side by black letters; presentation was as Task 2 except that items were presented on a grey background to match Task 6 (see below).
Task 6: Reverse-polarity flankers
Target black letters (n = 24) were flanked on each side by white letters, all presented on a grey background.
