# The Covariance Adjustment Approaches for Combining Incomparable Cox Regressions Caused by Unbalanced Covariates Adjustment: A Multivariate Meta-Analysis Study

**Authors:** Tania Dehesh, Najaf Zare, Seyyed Mohammad Taghi Ayatollahi

PMC · DOI: 10.1155/2015/801031 · Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine · 2015-09-01

## TL;DR

This paper introduces new methods to improve the accuracy of combining statistical models when some data is missing.

## Contribution

The study proposes four new covariance adjustment approaches for multivariate meta-analysis of Cox regression models.

## Key findings

- The MMC approach outperformed others in terms of accuracy and precision.
- MGLS meta-analysis is more advantageous than univariate methods.
- Simulation results showed reduced bias and error with the MMC method.

## Abstract

Background. Univariate meta-analysis (UM) procedure, as a technique that provides a single overall result, has become increasingly popular. Neglecting the existence of other concomitant covariates in the models leads to loss of treatment efficiency. Our aim was
proposing four new approximation approaches for the covariance matrix of the coefficients, which is not readily available for the multivariate generalized least square (MGLS) method as a multivariate meta-analysis approach. Methods. We evaluated the efficiency of four new approaches including zero correlation (ZC), common correlation (CC), estimated correlation (EC), and multivariate multilevel correlation (MMC) on the estimation bias, mean square error (MSE), and 95% probability coverage of the confidence interval (CI) in the synthesis of Cox proportional hazard models coefficients in a simulation study. Result. Comparing the results of the simulation study on the MSE, bias, and CI of the estimated coefficients indicated that MMC approach was the most accurate procedure compared to EC, CC, and ZC procedures. The precision ranking of the four approaches according to all above settings was MMC ≥ EC ≥ CC ≥ ZC. Conclusion. This study highlights advantages of MGLS meta-analysis on UM approach. The results suggested the use of MMC procedure to overcome the lack of
information for having a complete covariance matrix of the coefficients.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** MGLS (MESH:D004829), APD (MESH:D020914), male breast cancer (MESH:D018567), rare cancer (MESH:D009369), CI (OMIM:610141)
- **Chemicals:** S (MESH:D013455), CC (-)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC4568051/full.md

## Figures

2 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC4568051/full.md

## References

27 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC4568051/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC4568051