Comment on “Transmission Model of Hepatitis B Virus with the Migration Effect”
Abid Ali Lashari

TL;DR
This paper corrects errors in a hepatitis B virus transmission model and provides a more accurate stability criterion and reproduction number.
Contribution
The paper identifies and corrects mathematical errors in eigenvalue calculations and presents an improved stability criterion.
Findings
Erroneous eigenvalue calculations in recent mathematical biology literature are identified.
An improved stability criterion for the hepatitis B virus transmission model is proposed.
The correct basic reproduction number for the model is determined.
Abstract
Some consequences of erroneous results concerning eigenvalues in the recent literature of mathematical biology are highlighted. Furthermore, an improved stability criterion and the true value of the basic reproduction number is presented.
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology Models · Stochastic processes and statistical mechanics · Mathematical Biology Tumor Growth
1. Introduction
Stability analysis of a mathematical model describing the dynamics of a problem in biology requires a knowledge of the eigenvalues of the Jacobian matrix associated with the matrix [1]. The Routh-Hurwitz criteria give necessary and sufficient conditions for the eigenvalues to lie in the left half of the complex plane. However, recent literature in mathematical biology contains instances of authors establishing stability of the Jacobian matrix by using erroneous results concerning eigenvalues of a matrix. One of the results is stated below.
- Eigenvalues of a matrix are invariant under elementary row [or column] operations. See, for example, Khan et al.'s Theorems 1 and 2.
2. Falseness of the Above Statement
The example occurs in the proof of Theorems 1 and 2 of Khan et al. [2]. The theorem states the following:
- (1)
- For R* 0 ≤ 1*, the disease-free equilibrium of the system (3) about an equilibrium point D* 0 = (S ^0^, 0,0, 0,0)* is locally asymptotically stable if Q* 1(δ + δ 0 + p)(δ + γ 1) > βγ 1(δπ + δ 0); otherwise, the disease-free equilibrium of system (3) is unstable for R 0 > 1.
- (2)
- For R* 0 > 1*, the endemic equilibrium D* ^∗^
- of system (3) is locally asymptotically stable, if the following conditions hold:*
- otherwise, the system is unstable.
In order to prove these results, they performed elementary row operation for the Jacobian matrix J 0(ζ) (9) at the disease-free equilibrium D 0 and obtained matrix J 0(ζ) (10) (similarly, by elementary row operation for the Jacobian matrix J ^∗^(ζ) (14) at D ^∗^ and obtaining the matrix J ^∗^(ζ) (15)). Then, they analyse matrices (10) and (15) obtained after elementary row transformation from (9) and (14), respectively, to show that all the eigenvalues of (9) and (14) are negative from which they concluded the above assertions of their theorem. This reasoning would have been valid if elementary row transformation preserved eigenvalues, which, however, does not as shown below.
The eigenvalues for matrices (9) and (10) (similarly of matrices (14) and (15)) in [2] are not the same as they violate the well known criteria that the sum of the eigenvalues of a matrix is the same as the trace of that matrix. Now, the difference of the traces of matrices (9) and (10) is
By the same reasoning, it can be easily seen that the difference of the traces of matrices (14) and (15) is also not zero. The eigenvalues would have been the same if the difference between the trace of the original and the trace of the matrix obtained after row transformation equals zero, which, however, does not. Clearly, the eigenvalues may change after an elementary row transformation. The above statement may hold in special cases but is false in general.
Moreover, the true value of the basic reproduction number R 0 of system (3), which measures the average number of new infections generated by a single infected individual in a completely susceptible population, is given by
Now, we will show that the local stability of the disease-free equilibrium is completely determined by R 0 and present an improved stability result below.
Theorem 1 . The disease-free equilibrium of model (3) in [2] is locally asymptotically stable if R 0 < 1 and unstable if R 0 > 1.
ProofThe characteristic equation of the Jacobian matrix (9) in [2] is given by
where
Two of the roots of the characteristic equation (4), λ 1 = −δ − δ 0 − p and λ 2 = −μ 1 − μ 2 − δ, have negative real parts. The other three roots can be determined from the cubic term in (4). Using (5), direct calculations shows that
The term under brace is greater than zero if R 0 < 1. Hence, a 1 a 2 − a 3 > 0. Thus, by Routh-Hurwitz criteria, the DFE of system (3) in [2] is locally asymptotically stable about the point D 0 = (S ^0^, 0,0, 0,0) if R 0 < 1. Therefore, the extra condition Q 1(δ + δ 0 + p)(δ + γ 1) > βγ 1(δπ + δ 0) is not required and the local stability of the disease-free equilibrium is completely determined by R 0.
3. Conclusion
This paper has pointed out some technical problems in the results in [2] and has presented the corrected version of the corresponding result and the true value of the basic reproduction number. Studies of mathematical models of the spread of hepatitis B virus have great impact on health authorities' planning and allocation of funds to control the spread of infectious diseases. The effective control decisions of the disease have an important role in the combat of the disease and will be very useful for the public as well as the funding agencies. However such resources are likely to go to waste if scientific studies which purport to guide them are based on faulty theoretical basis. The conclusion based on the model proposed by Khan et al. [2] may not be valid and hepatitis B may still be far from reaching its equilibrium from the community. A wrong mathematical result published in a respectable journal, if left unchallenged, is usually accepted by young research workers as gospel. It is likely to corrupt the scientific literature with growing speed in a manner like the spreading of an infectious disease.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1Cai L.Lashari A. A.Jung I. H.Okosun K. O.Seo Y. I.Mathematical analysis of a malaria model with partial immunity to re-infection Abstract and Applied Analysis 201320131740525810.1155/2013/4052582-s 2.0-84875477464 · doi ↗
- 2Khan M. A.Islam S.Arif M.Ul Haq Z.Transmission model of hepatitis B virus with the migration effect Bio Med Research International 201320131015068110.1155/2013/1506812-s 2.0-84880147465 PMC 374599423984318 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
