Interactions between visceral afferent signaling and stimulus processing

TL;DR

This paper explores how signals from the body's autonomic system influence brain activity and emotional processing in humans.

Contribution

The study reveals new insights into how visceral afferent signals specifically affect the processing of emotionally salient stimuli.

Findings

Neuroimaging shows correlations between autonomic changes and specific neural activity patterns.

Baroreceptor activation facilitates fear and threat processing at neural and behavioral levels.

Dynamic autonomic states are integrated with perceptual and emotional processes in the brain.

Abstract

Visceral afferent signals to the brain influence thoughts, feelings and behavior. Here we highlight the findings of a set of empirical investigations in humans concerning body-mind interaction that focus on how feedback from states of autonomic arousal shapes cognition and emotion. There is a longstanding debate regarding the contribution of the body to mental processes. Recent theoretical models broadly acknowledge the role of (autonomically-mediated) physiological arousal to emotional, social and motivational behaviors, yet the underlying mechanisms are only partially characterized. Neuroimaging is overcoming this shortfall; first, by demonstrating correlations between autonomic change and discrete patterns of evoked, and task-independent, neural activity; second, by mapping the central consequences of clinical perturbations in autonomic response and; third, by probing how dynamic fluctuations in peripheral autonomic state are integrated with perceptual, cognitive and emotional processes. Building on the notion that an important source of the brain's representation of physiological arousal is derived from afferent information from arterial baroreceptors, we have exploited the phasic nature of these signals to show their differential contribution to the processing of emotionally-salient stimuli. This recent work highlights the facilitation at neural and behavioral levels of fear and threat processing that contrasts with the more established observations of the inhibition of central pain processing during baroreceptors activation. The implications of this body-brain-mind axis are discussed.

Figures