Erratum to “Localized and Sustained Delivery of Erythropoietin from PLGA Microspheres Promotes Functional Recovery and Nerve Regeneration in Peripheral Nerve Injury”
Wei Zhang, Yuan Gao, Yan Zhou, Jianheng Liu, Licheng Zhang, Anhua Long, Lihai Zhang, Peifu Tang
Abstract
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsNerve injury and regeneration · Vagus Nerve Stimulation Research · Acupuncture Treatment Research Studies
In the paper titled “Localized and Sustained Delivery of Erythropoietin from PLGA Microspheres Promotes Functional Recovery and Nerve Regeneration in Peripheral Nerve Injury” we have found that, in Figure 1(d), one panel is mistakenly a duplication of the adjacent panel. The upper two western blotting results are identical. According to our inspection of the original data sets, this is due to a mistake during the editorial process of the figures. We show here the amended Figure 1(d), with the correct image for the western blotting results of group EPO.
Due to the same reason, another mistake was made in the lower left panel of Figure 4. The label of the y-axis, “Axon count (field),” should read “Axon count (per field).” And a typo was found in the beginning of the second line under Section 3.1 that “aws” should read “was.”