# Attitudes towards using single-pill combination (polypill) therapy in heart failure: patients' and physicians' perspectives

**Authors:** Jan Biegus, Rafał Tymków, Javed Butler, Marco Metra, Ovidiu Chioncel, Vijay Chopra, Marianna Adamo, Julio Nuñez, Giuseppe Rosano, Clara Saldarriaga, Michael Böhm, Shelley Zieroth, Piotr Ponikowski

PMC · DOI: 10.1093/eschf/xvag044 · ESC Heart Failure · 2026-02-11

## TL;DR

This study explores patients' and physicians' attitudes toward using a single-pill combination therapy for heart failure, finding strong support for such a treatment to reduce pill burden and improve adherence.

## Contribution

The paper provides novel insights into the perceived clinical need and feasibility of a heart failure-specific polypill from both patient and physician perspectives.

## Key findings

- 77% of physicians reported a clear need for simplifying heart failure treatment through a single-pill combination.
- 83% of patients would take an HF-specific polypill if offered, especially if it reduces pill burden and has no extra cost.
- Preferred polypill composition includes beta-blocker, MRA, and SGLT2 inhibitor according to 61.2% of physicians.

## Abstract

Single-pill combinations (SPC, polypills) have proven effective in cardiovascular areas, yet no such therapy exists for patients with heart failure (HF) despite substantial polypharmacy and pill burden in this population. Simplifying treatment through an HF-specific SPC containing key guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) components could improve adherence and outcomes.

Two prospective, electronic surveys were conducted between June and October 2025 to assess real-world attitudes towards a polypill in HF with ejection fraction ≤50%. The physician-oriented survey (22 questions) was distributed internationally and explored GDMT practices, perceived needs, barriers, and potential preferred composition of an HF dedicated SPC. The patient-oriented survey (11 questions) explored medication burden, adherence, and perceptions of a potential polypill use.

A total of 250 physicians and 126 patients participated. Among physicians, 77% reported a clear need for strategies to simplify GDMT optimisation in HFrEF, with cost (66%) and polypharmacy (54%) being selected as the most frequent barriers. Nearly all physicians (95%) recognized a real clinical need for an HF-specific SPC, and most perceived it as clinically useful (88%), logistically feasible (76%), and acceptable to patients (94%). Approximately 48% of physicians declared that they would use it regularly, and another 49% would use it in selected patients. The preferred composition of HF-specific SPC included a beta-blocker, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA), and SGLT2 inhibitor (61.2%).

Among patients, polypharmacy was common (70% taking ≥6 drugs daily), and 75% admitted to occasional non-adherence. Most responders (82%) would support a solution that reduces the pill burden, and 83% would take an HF-specific SCP if offered, particularly if there is no extra cost.

Both physicians and patients showed strong openness and willingness towards an HF-specific SPC, supporting further development and evaluation of HF-specific polypill strategies.

Graphical AbstractAttitudes toward using single-pill combination therapy in heart failure: patients' and physicians' perspectives.For image description, please refer to the figure legend and surrounding text.

Attitudes toward using single-pill combination therapy in heart failure: patients' and physicians' perspectives.

## Linked entities

- **Diseases:** heart failure (MONDO:0005252)

## Full-text entities

- **Genes:** SLC5A2 (solute carrier family 5 member 2) [NCBI Gene 6524] {aka SGLT2}
- **Diseases:** HF (MESH:D006333)
- **Chemicals:** Polypill (-)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC13042294/full.md

## Figures

6 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC13042294/full.md

## References

15 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC13042294/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC13042294