Corrigendum to ‘Superhuman performance on urology board questions using an explainable language model enhanced with European Association of Urology guidelines’: [ESMO Real World Data and Digital Oncology, Volume 6, December 2024, 100078]
M.J. Hetz, N. Carl, S. Haggenmüller, C. Wies, J.N. Kather, M.S. Michel, F. Wessels, T.J. Brinker
Abstract
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education · Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills · Surgical Simulation and Training
The authors regret that the original article did not explicitly state that the 2024 European Association of Urology (EAU) Guidelines were downloaded and utilised with written permission from the EAU Guidelines Office. The guidelines were used as a reference source to support the development and evaluation of the language model. The study was conducted independently, and responsibility for the content, interpretation, and conclusions of the work lies solely with the authors. The EAU was not involved in the study design, analysis, or manuscript preparation and does not endorse or assume responsibility for the application or its outputs. In the event of any discrepancies, the original EAU Guidelines remain the authoritative source.
The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused.