# Balancing grain and forage production in dual-purpose cereals: physiological basis, yield variation, and economic evaluation

**Authors:** Dan Wu, Yuanyan Meng, Xianfu Lv, Qingfu Huang, Mingyue Haung, Hua Jiang, Liuxing Xu

PMC · DOI: 10.1186/s12870-026-08446-5 · BMC Plant Biology · 2026-02-26

## TL;DR

This study examines how managing dual-purpose cereals affects grain and forage yields, finding that oat is best for dual use while barley is ideal for forage.

## Contribution

The study introduces a factor analysis model linking physiological traits to yield and economic outcomes in dual-purpose cereals.

## Key findings

- Grain + forage reduced wheat's fresh and dry matter yields compared to grain-only systems.
- Oat outperformed other crops in photosynthetic and antioxidant indicators under dual-purpose management.
- Rainfall instability is the main natural factor limiting dual-purpose crop adoption.

## Abstract

Dual-purpose crops have become an indispensable part of crop-livestock systems. However, selecting suitable crops and implementing dual-purpose management pose unpredictable challenges to achieving suitable yields and economic returns. This study analyzed the effects of two treatments (grain and grain + forage) on the yield and photosynthetic and antioxidant properties of four crops (barley, triticale, oat, and wheat) over three growing seasons (2021–2022, season 1; 2022–2023, season 2; and 2023–2024, season 3) and assessed the yield and economic benefits. Compared to oat, barley, and triticale, grain + forage reduced (P < 0.05) the fresh matter and dry matter yields of wheat in the post-cutting growth period and grain yield at harvest. The fresh matter and dry matter yields at harvest of grain + forage were reduced (P < 0.05) by 31.7% and 21.5% compared with those of grain only, respectively. The factor analysis model constructed based on photosynthetic and antioxidant indicators (13 indicators) was ordered season 1 > season 2 > season 3 based on season, oat > wheat > triticale > barley based on crop, and grain only > grain + forage based on cropping system. Dual-purpose cropping demonstrated economic viability and sustainability by improving the harvest index despite reduced grain yield. However, the instability of rainfall has become the most critical natural factor limiting the promotion of dual-purpose crop management. When considering dual-purpose or grain-only cropping systems, oat emerged as the optimal choice, whereas for forage production, barley was the ideal singular crop.

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12870-026-08446-5.

## Full-text entities

- **Genes:** Peroxidase [NCBI Gene 548137]
- **Diseases:** drought (MESH:C536747)
- **Chemicals:** phosphate (MESH:D010710), Free amino acid (-), K2O (MESH:C068440), phenol (MESH:D019800), amino acid (MESH:D000596), malonaldehyde (MESH:D008315), phenols (MESH:D010636), P2O5 (MESH:C012500), H2O2 (MESH:D006861), CO2 (MESH:D002245), carbohydrates (MESH:D002241), ascorbate (MESH:D001205), water vapor (MESH:D013227), polyphenol (MESH:D059808), catechol (MESH:C034221), FAA (MESH:C049328), Ninhydrin (MESH:D009555), guaiacol (MESH:D006139), starch (MESH:D013213), N (MESH:D009584), EDTA (MESH:D004492), sugar (MESH:D000073893), Water (MESH:D014867), anthrone (MESH:C004522)
- **Species:** Meleagris gallopavo (common turkey, species) [taxon 9103], Bos taurus (bovine, species) [taxon 9913], Triticum aestivum (bread wheat, species) [taxon 4565], Glycine max (soybean, species) [taxon 3847], x Triticosecale (triticale, genus) [taxon 49317], Avena sativa (cultivated oat, species) [taxon 4498], Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606], Hordeum vulgare (barley, species) [taxon 4513]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC13040776/full.md

## Figures

3 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC13040776/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC13040776