# Biophilic design in hospital environments: a rapid review of nature-integrated strategies and patient outcomes

**Authors:** Yishan Du, Mei Xie, Yuanyuan Zou

PMC · DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2026.1786483 · Frontiers in Public Health · 2026-03-03

## TL;DR

This paper reviews how incorporating nature into hospital design can improve patient recovery, comfort, and satisfaction, though more research is needed.

## Contribution

The study provides a rapid review of empirical evidence on biophilic design in hospitals and identifies key strategies and outcomes.

## Key findings

- Biophilic interventions like plants and daylight improve stress recovery and emotional well-being.
- Direct exposure to nature has stronger effects than simulated nature.
- More rigorous longitudinal studies are needed to confirm long-term clinical benefits.

## Abstract

Biophilic design has received growing attention as hospitals increasingly seek evidence-based strategies to support patient recovery, psychological comfort, and staff well-being. This rapid review synthesizes empirical findings on nature-integrated design interventions in hospital settings and evaluates their impacts on patient outcomes. Searches across Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed, and Google Scholar did not impose a formal restriction on publication year; however, priority was given to more recent empirical studies in order to capture the latest developments in biophilic design research within healthcare environments. Convergent evidence shows that biophilic interventions—including indoor plants, green views, natural materials, optimized daylight, healing gardens, and nature-themed digital media—enhance stress recovery, reduce pain, improve emotional well-being and sleep quality, and elevate satisfaction with care. Effects are strongest for direct exposure to real nature and moderately strong for simulated nature. Proposed mechanisms include attentional restoration, stress reduction, positive environmental appraisals, and heightened perceived control. However, evidence for long-term clinical outcomes remains limited, and methodological heterogeneity constrains cross-study comparability. Overall, this review highlights promising design strategies and underscores the need for more rigorous longitudinal and interdisciplinary research to advance biophilic healthcare design.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** pain (MESH:D010146)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC13040352/full.md

## Figures

1 figure with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC13040352/full.md

## References

63 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC13040352/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC13040352