# Evaluating multimodal commercial and open-source large language models for dynamical astronomy: a benchmark study of resonant behavior classification

## TL;DR

This paper evaluates how well large language models can classify types of astronomical resonances from images, comparing commercial and open-source models.

## Contribution

The study introduces new benchmark datasets and shows that open-source models can achieve high accuracy in resonance classification without training.

## Key findings

- Commercial LLMs achieved 100% accuracy on simple resonance cases and up to 94% on complex three-class datasets.
- Open-source models reached 100% on clear cases and 76% on complex ones, approaching commercial performance on full binary benchmarks.
- LLMs can perform resonance classification at levels comparable to traditional methods without training or fine-tuning.

## Abstract

We present a systematic evaluation of modern multimodal large language models (LLMs) for the classification of mean-motion and secular resonances from images of resonant arguments. Four benchmark datasets (RB-TEST, RB-PILOT, RB-SMALL, RB-FULL) were constructed to cover clear, ambiguous, and transient cases, with both binary and three-class outputs. Using standardized prompts (a full prompt for large models and a simplified variant for small models that cannot process complex instructions), we tested flagship commercial models, large open-source models, and small locally runnable models. Commercial LLMs reach \documentclass[12pt]{minimal}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{wasysym}
\usepackage{amsfonts}
\usepackage{amssymb}
\usepackage{amsbsy}
\usepackage{mathrsfs}
\usepackage{upgreek}
\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt}
\begin{document}$$F_1=100\%$$\end{document} on simple cases and up to \documentclass[12pt]{minimal}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{wasysym}
\usepackage{amsfonts}
\usepackage{amssymb}
\usepackage{amsbsy}
\usepackage{mathrsfs}
\usepackage{upgreek}
\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt}
\begin{document}$$94\%$$\end{document} on the three-class RB-SMALL dataset, while the best open-source models also reach \documentclass[12pt]{minimal}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{wasysym}
\usepackage{amsfonts}
\usepackage{amssymb}
\usepackage{amsbsy}
\usepackage{mathrsfs}
\usepackage{upgreek}
\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt}
\begin{document}$$100\%$$\end{document} on unambiguous cases and \documentclass[12pt]{minimal}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{wasysym}
\usepackage{amsfonts}
\usepackage{amssymb}
\usepackage{amsbsy}
\usepackage{mathrsfs}
\usepackage{upgreek}
\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt}
\begin{document}$$76\%$$\end{document} on the complex ones. On the full binary benchmark, open-source models approach commercial performance (\documentclass[12pt]{minimal}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{wasysym}
\usepackage{amsfonts}
\usepackage{amssymb}
\usepackage{amsbsy}
\usepackage{mathrsfs}
\usepackage{upgreek}
\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt}
\begin{document}$$F_1\approx 90$$\end{document}–\documentclass[12pt]{minimal}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{wasysym}
\usepackage{amsfonts}
\usepackage{amssymb}
\usepackage{amsbsy}
\usepackage{mathrsfs}
\usepackage{upgreek}
\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt}
\begin{document}$$96\%$$\end{document}). Most errors occur in transient and resonance-sticking regimes. The results show that LLMs can perform resonance classification at levels comparable to those of classical or machine-learning methods without training or fine-tuning, and that even small open-source models achieve practically useful accuracy. The released benchmarks establish a reproducible standard for evaluating LLMs on dynamical astronomy tasks.