# “I would walk through fire to get this vaccine”: a mixed-methods study examining attitudes and perceptions of a gonorrhoea vaccine programme among UK sexual health service users

**Authors:** Charlie Firth, Sophia Wilkinson, Sam Martin, Samantha Vanderslott, Andrew J Pollard, Katrina M Pollock

PMC · DOI: 10.1136/bmjph-2025-003819 · BMJ Public Health · 2026-03-27

## TL;DR

This study explores attitudes toward the UK's first gonorrhoea vaccine among sexual health service users, finding strong support but highlighting barriers like stigma and cost.

## Contribution

The study provides novel insights into public perceptions and practical recommendations for implementing a gonorrhoea vaccine programme in a stigma-sensitive and equitable manner.

## Key findings

- 92.2% of participants strongly supported a gonorrhoea vaccine programme, driven by concerns about antimicrobial resistance and trust in UK regulatory systems.
- Stigma, cost, and inconvenient delivery settings were key barriers to vaccine access, with participants favoring delivery through sexual health clinics and LGBTQ+ venues.
- Participants accepted partial vaccine efficacy when transparently communicated but expressed concerns that personal costs could worsen health inequalities.

## Abstract

Antimicrobial-resistant gonorrhoea poses a significant global public health threat. In response, the UK launched the world’s first gonorrhoea vaccination programme using a 4CMenB vaccine, targeting individuals at high risk of bacterial sexually transmitted infections (STIs). Understanding attitudes and acceptability among sexual health service users is essential to inform successful implementation.

The NAVIGATE study employed a mixed-methods design, combining an online survey (n=395) with semi-structured interviews (n=15) among UK adults who had previously accessed sexual health services. The survey included demographic questions, the validated Vaccination Attitudes Examination scale and items assessing the acceptability of gonorrhoea vaccine. Interviews explored deeper perceptions of vaccination, trust and delivery preferences. Quantitative data were analysed descriptively and qualitative data thematically using Braun and Clarke’s framework.

Participants showed high general vaccine confidence, with 92.2% strongly supporting a gonorrhoea vaccine programme. Acceptance was driven by concerns about antimicrobial resistance and trust in UK regulatory systems. Stigma and structural barriers, such as fear of judgement, cost and inconvenient delivery settings, were key factors influencing access. Participants favoured delivery through sexual health clinics and LGBTQ+ venues and strongly endorsed peer-led outreach. Partial efficacy of the proposed vaccine was accepted when transparently communicated. Concerns over personal costs emerged as potentially worsening inequalities.

While overall acceptability was high, successful uptake requires delivery that is trusted, stigma-free, accessible and clearly communicated. Policy recommendations include ensuring free access, leveraging peer-led campaigns and delivering vaccination in low-barrier settings. Monitoring by demographic group is essential to prevent inequities. These insights are crucial as the UK’s pioneering programme generates global evidence for future STI vaccine policy.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** STI (MESH:D012749), gonorrhoea (MESH:D006069), bacterial sexually transmitted infections (MESH:D015231)
- **Chemicals:** 4CMenB (-)

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC13034242/full.md

## Figures

2 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC13034242/full.md

## References

46 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC13034242/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC13034242