# Evaluation of microbiological cultures in patients with acute cholecystitis

**Authors:** Dániel Váczi, Mária Matuz, Ria Benkő, Illés Tóth, Emil Terhes, Edit Hajdú, Erika Papfalvi, András Nagy, György Lázár, Szabolcs Ábrahám

PMC · DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2026.1739629 · Frontiers in Surgery · 2026-03-16

## TL;DR

This study analyzed bile samples from patients with acute cholecystitis to identify common bacteria and their antibiotic resistance patterns, helping guide effective antibiotic use.

## Contribution

The study provides a detailed antibiogram of common pathogens in acute cholecystitis, including MDR and ESKAPE strains, to inform empirical antibiotic therapy.

## Key findings

- Gram-negative bacteria were most commonly isolated, with Escherichia spp. being the most prevalent.
- ESKAPE pathogens were found in 26.46% of cases, and a higher inflammation grade was associated with more ESKAPE infections.
- E. coli showed high resistance to ciprofloxacin and sulfamethoxazole–trimethoprim, with 25% being MDR.

## Abstract

Acute cholecystitis (AC) requires emergency care. Besides surgical interventions, adequate empirical antibiotic therapy is indispensable. We aimed to analyze bile samples obtained during surgical interventions for AC. The primary aim was determine sampling frequency, pathogen prevalence (including ESKAPE strains), and to create the cumulative antibiogram of the most common bacteria (including MDR pathogens). A secondary aim was to explore the potential relationship between pathogen type (ESKAPE, MDR) and different patient characteristics in acute cholecystitis.

A retrospective observational study was conducted. Bile samples from patients undergoing acute cholecystectomy or percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage for acute cholecystitis between 2005 and 2019 were analyzed. Cases were retrieved based on the respective ICD-10 codes. Descriptive and univariate methods were used.

During the study period there were 656 patients with AC; bile samples for microbiology were collected in 379 cases (57.8%). Overall, 412 bacteria, predominantly Gram-negative microbes (60.9%), were isolated. The most common bacteria included Escherichia spp. (25.7%), Streptococcus spp. (13.8%), Enterococcus spp. (13.6%). The proportion of MDR strains was 14.9%. Meanwhile, 109 of 412 pathogens (26.46%) were ESKAPE pathogens. A higher grade of inflammation was associated with a higher incidence of ESKAPE pathogens. E. coli exhibited high susceptibility (>90%) to third- and fourth-generation cephalosporins and carbapenems, but lower susceptibility to ciprofloxacin (80%) and sulfamethoxazole–trimethoprim (78%), with 25% of isolates being MDR. Among Gram-positive bacteria, 14.3% of Enterococcus spp. were vancomycin-resistant, while no MRSA was detected in bile samples.

Microbiological sampling, identifying the most common pathogens and determining the antibiotic resistance profile in AC is important to determine the optimal empirical antibiotic choice.

## Linked entities

- **Chemicals:** cephalosporins (PubChem CID 25058126), carbapenems (PubChem CID 134085), ciprofloxacin (PubChem CID 2764), sulfamethoxazole–trimethoprim (PubChem CID 358641), vancomycin (PubChem CID 14969)
- **Diseases:** acute cholecystitis (MONDO:0002155)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** AC (MESH:D041881), MDR (MESH:D018088), inflammation (MESH:D007249)
- **Chemicals:** carbapenems (MESH:D015780), ciprofloxacin (MESH:D002939), cephalosporins (MESH:D002511), vancomycin (MESH:D014640), sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim (MESH:D015662)
- **Species:** Bacteria Latreille et al. 1825 (Bacteria stick insect, genus) [taxon 629395], Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606], Escherichia coli (E. coli, species) [taxon 562]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC13033935/full.md

## Figures

2 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC13033935/full.md

## References

50 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC13033935/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC13033935