# Cardiovascular Outcomes and Vascular Surrogate Markers in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Treated With Anti-Tumour Necrosis Factor (TNF) Therapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

## TL;DR

This study reviews the effects of anti-TNF therapy on cardiovascular risk markers in rheumatoid arthritis patients and finds no significant differences compared to control treatments.

## Contribution

The study provides a meta-analysis of recent randomized trials on anti-TNF therapy's impact on cardiovascular risk markers in RA patients.

## Key findings

- Anti-TNF therapy showed no significant effect on lipid parameters like LDL-C, HDL-C, and triglycerides.
- No significant differences were observed in blood pressure measurements between treatment groups.
- Triglyceride results were unstable due to a single study, while other outcomes were stable.

## Abstract

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is linked with a high risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD), which is mainly triggered by chronic systemic inflammation. Tumour necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors are effective in managing RA disease activity; however, their impact on cardiovascular risk markers is also unclear. The systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the effects of anti-TNF therapy on conventional cardiovascular risk markers, specifically lipid parameters and blood pressure, in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. We searched PubMed, Embase, Google Scholar, and the Cochrane Library for randomised controlled trials published after 2010 that compared anti-TNF therapy with control treatments in adults with RA; 4 trials met the inclusion criteria. The lipid parameters (low-density lipoprotein cholesterol [LDL-C], high-density lipoprotein [HDL-C], triglycerides, and total cholesterol) and blood pressure were the outcomes. The Cochrane RoB 2.0 tool was used to measure risk of bias. Mean differences and 95% confidence intervals were used to produce random-effects meta-analyses. There were four randomised controlled trials with 295 participants. No statistically significant differences were found between the anti-TNF therapy and control groups for LDL-C, HDL-C, triglycerides, total cholesterol, systolic blood pressure, or diastolic blood pressure. The sensitivity analysis revealed that triglyceride results were unstable due to a single study, whereas the remaining results were very stable. In available RCTs, no statistically significant differences were observed between anti-TNF therapy and control treatments for conventional cardiovascular risk markers in patients with RA. More extensive and prolonged studies that include standardised cardiovascular outcomes should be undertaken to elucidate the cardiovascular effects of anti-TNF therapy.