Is liquid biopsy a cost-effective method to diagnose Burkitt Lymphoma in children and young adults? A health economic evaluation in Tanzania
Jingjing Jiang, Liz Morrell, Malale Tungu, William F. Mawalla, Clara Chamba, Lulu Chirande, Heronima J. Kashaigili, Elifuraha Mkwizu, Paul S. Ntemi, Godlove Sandi, Kristin Schroeder, Anna Schuh, George M. Ruhago, Sarah Wordsworth, Jingjing Jiang, Jingjing Jiang, Liz Morrell

TL;DR
This study evaluates whether liquid biopsy is a cost-effective way to diagnose Burkitt Lymphoma in children in Tanzania, finding it could reduce health burdens despite higher costs.
Contribution
The study provides the first health economic evaluation of liquid biopsy for Burkitt Lymphoma diagnosis in a low-resource African setting.
Findings
Liquid biopsy reduces the disease burden by 1.11 DALYs per patient compared to histopathology.
The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio is $1778 per DALY averted.
Liquid biopsy is more likely to be cost-effective at thresholds above $1890/DALY averted.
Abstract
Burkitt Lymphoma (BL) is a prevalent and highly aggressive childhood cancer in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). Outcomes are poor, due in part to delays or inaccuracies in diagnosis. Liquid biopsy (sequencing circulating tumour DNA from blood) is an alternative approach that is non-invasive and offers potential for a highly specific, rapid diagnosis, which could improve outcomes through earlier access to correct treatment. Diagnosis by liquid biopsy has undergone validation in SSA. However, evidence on its economic value is needed, especially in limited-resource settings. We present a cost-utility analysis comparing liquid biopsy with conventional local histopathology for the diagnosis of paediatric BL in Tanzania. A cost-utility model was constructed to compare the costs and effects of the alternative diagnostic approaches from a Tanzanian healthcare provider perspective, over a lifetime…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAcute Lymphoblastic Leukemia research · Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment · Lymphadenopathy Diagnosis and Analysis
