# Evidence for virus-associated recapping behaviour in honey bees (Apis mellifera) with differential detection sensitivity between varroa-resistant and non-resistant colonies

## TL;DR

This study shows that viruses may influence honey bees' recapping behavior, which could help colonies resist Varroa mites and viral infections.

## Contribution

The study provides new evidence that viruses, not just mites, may trigger recapping behavior in honey bees.

## Key findings

- Recapping behavior is associated with brood viral infections in honey bees.
- Worker bees may detect virus-induced changes and adjust recapping behavior accordingly.
- The relationship between viruses and recapping differs between varroa-resistant and non-resistant colonies.

## Abstract

Social immunity is vital for protecting honey bee colonies from pathogens and parasites. Among these threats, the parasitic mite Varroa destructor is particularly devastating, both by weakening parasitized bees and by transmitting several potentially lethal viruses, most notably Deformed Wing Virus (DWV). To counteract varroa and the damage caused by viral epidemics, honey bees exhibit complex, socially organized hygienic behaviours, including Varroa Sensitive Hygiene (VSH), in which workers detect and remove varroa infested brood. A related behaviour, known as recapping, involves workers opening, inspecting, and re-sealing brood cells. While the triggers for VSH are increasingly understood, the factors driving recapping remain largely unexplored, especially the potential role of brood viral infections. This study investigates the relationship between brood viral infections and recapping, and whether this relationship differs between naturally varroa-resistant and non-resistant colonies. Building on earlier work linking varroa-parasitized brood to recapping, our results provide evidence that viruses may also play a role in this behaviour. These findings suggest that worker bees may be able to detect changes induced by different virus infections and modulate recapping accordingly, highlighting a nuanced interplay between pathogen pressure and social immunity.

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41598-026-44836-3.