# A Comprehensive Study on Radiological Hazard Assessment and Geological Features of Gypsum Deposits

## TL;DR

This study evaluates the natural radioactivity and radiological hazards in gypsum samples from a specific geological area, finding most samples safe but some exceeding hazard thresholds.

## Contribution

The study provides a detailed radiological hazard assessment of gypsum deposits using statistical methods like PCA and HCA.

## Key findings

- Most gypsum samples had radioactivity levels below international safety limits.
- Six samples exceeded one or more radiological hazard indices.
- 238U was identified as the main contributor to radiological hazards in the samples.

## Abstract

This study assessed natural radioactivity values and corresponding radiological hazards in gypsum samples collected from the investigated area. The geologic context mainly includes tertiary and quaternary sedimentary formations with gypsum horizons of Early Messinian age, interbedded with layers of limestone and marl. A total of thirty-five gypsum samples were collected and analyzed for the 238U, 232Th, and 40K activity concentration using High-Purity Germanium (HPGe) gamma-ray spectrometry. The mean activity concentrations for the gypsums are reported at 73 ± 87 Bq kg−1, 14 ± 17 Bq kg−1, and 35 ± 201 Bq kg−1 for 238U, 232Th, and 40K, respectively. Several related radiological hazard indices were estimated from the various activity concentrations, including radium equivalent activity (Raeq) and absorbed dose rate (Dair). All gypsum analyzed fell below international safety limits for radiological risk, as evidenced by the observed radium equivalent activity (Raeq), with a maximum value of 456 Bq kg−1, and the total annual effective dose (AED) values from 0.09 to 1.26 mSv y−1 remaining between these two values. The results indicate the levels of radioactive hazards of the gypsum samples were generally below global safety standards, but individual samples (i.e., S17, S20, S24, S26, S30, S35) exceeded one or more of the hazard indices. Statistical assessment of the samples, with respect to their radiological hazard and natural radioactivity, was also undertaken as a way of seeking further insights into their relationships, productivity, and characteristics. This included Pearson correlation, hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA) and principal component analysis (PCA). The evidence suggests that for the gypsums, 238U was the greatest contributor to radiological hazards, influencing all hazard indices.