# Volatile Compound Profiling and Quality Assessment of Sweet Fermented High-Amylose Rice: A Comparative GC-MS Analysis with Traditional Glutinous Rice Fermentation

**Authors:** Kamonwan Chucheep, Nongnuch Siriwong, Zee Wei Lai, Naree Phanchindawan

PMC · DOI: 10.3390/molecules31060937 · Molecules · 2026-03-11

## TL;DR

This study compares the fermentation and volatile compound profiles of a Thai high-amylose rice variety with traditional glutinous rice, finding distinct chemical and nutritional differences.

## Contribution

The study introduces a novel comparative analysis of high-amylose rice fermentation, revealing unique volatile and nutritional profiles.

## Key findings

- Sweet fermented high-amylose LPC rice showed superior mineral retention and antioxidant capacity compared to glutinous rice.
- GC-MS analysis identified variety-specific volatile compounds, including exclusive ethyl acetate in SFLPC and higher ethyl palmitate in SFGR.
- Starch gelatinization was comparable between varieties, indicating differences arise from rice type, not processing.

## Abstract

High-amylose Lueang Patew Chumphon (LPC) rice, a Thai geographical indication variety, represents an underutilized resource for functional food development. This study investigated sweet fermented LPC rice (SFLPC) compared to conventional sweet fermented glutinous rice (SFGR) through comprehensive microbial, chemical, and nutritional characterization. Starter cakes contained Aspergillus sp., Rhizopus stolonifer, and Pediococcus pentosaceus (>99% similarity by ITS/16S rRNA sequencing and MALDI Biotyper). Both varieties demonstrated comparable fermentation with pH reductions to ~3.5 and lactic acid production (~6 g/L). GC-MS analysis with mass spectral library matching and Linear Retention Index (LRI) comparison tentatively annotated twelve volatile compounds. Absolute peak area analysis revealed distinct variety-specific profiles: SFGR was characterized by significantly higher ethyl palmitate (75.89 ± 19.30 vs. 16.80 ± 7.21 × 106, p = 0.008) and isobutyl alcohol (33.09 ± 3.56 vs. 23.53 ± 1.71 × 106, p = 0.014), exclusive ethyl dodecanoate (44.87 ± 20.60 × 106), and exclusive 2,4-di-tert-butylphenol, while SFLPC showed exclusive ethyl acetate formation. Isoamyl alcohol was the dominant volatile in both varieties, with comparable absolute peak areas (273.91 ± 22.65 vs. 267.54 ± 28.78 × 106, ns). SFLPC demonstrated superior mineral retention (2.1-fold phosphorus, 1.9-fold potassium and magnesium) and enhanced antioxidant capacity (IC50: 3.30 vs. 5.20 μg/mL, representing 36% improvement). Degree of gelatinization analysis validated comparable starch gelatinization (32.5–40.1%) despite different cooking methods, confirming volatile differences arose from rice variety rather than processing. These findings demonstrate high-amylose LPC rice as a promising fermented food substrate offering enhanced nutritional properties and volatile compound profiles through traditional fermentation.

## Linked entities

- **Chemicals:** ethyl palmitate (PubChem CID 12366), isobutyl alcohol (PubChem CID 6560), ethyl dodecanoate (PubChem CID 7800), 2,4-di-tert-butylphenol (PubChem CID 7311), ethyl acetate (PubChem CID 8857), isoamyl alcohol (PubChem CID 31260)
- **Species:** Aspergillus sp. (taxon 5065), Rhizopus stolonifer (taxon 4846), Pediococcus pentosaceus (taxon 1255)

## Full-text entities

- **Chemicals:** 2,4-di-tert-butylphenol (MESH:C056559), ethyl dodecanoate (MESH:C007677), potassium (MESH:D011188), phosphorus (MESH:D010758), isobutyl alcohol (MESH:C040507), starch (MESH:D013213), magnesium (MESH:D008274), Isoamyl alcohol (MESH:C029683), ethyl palmitate (MESH:C007680), LPC rice (-), lactic acid (MESH:D019344), ethyl acetate (MESH:C007650)
- **Species:** Rhizopus stolonifer (species) [taxon 4846], Oryza sativa (Asian cultivated rice, species) [taxon 4530], Aspergillus sp. (species) [taxon 5065], Pediococcus pentosaceus (species) [taxon 1255]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC13029767/full.md

## Figures

1 figure with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC13029767/full.md

## References

42 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC13029767/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC13029767