# Simvastatin Enhances Stem Cell Osteogenesis and Reduces Peri-Implant Bone Loss: An In Vitro and a Randomized Clinical Study

## TL;DR

Simvastatin in PRF improves stem cell bone growth and reduces bone loss around implants in both lab and clinical studies.

## Contribution

Demonstrates simvastatin-loaded PRF's effectiveness in enhancing osteogenesis and reducing peri-implant bone loss in clinical trials.

## Key findings

- Low simvastatin concentrations (0.1 μM) enhance osteogenic differentiation of hPDLSCs.
- PRF with simvastatin significantly reduces peri-implant bone loss compared to PRF alone.
- PRF with simvastatin performs similarly to PRF with bone graft in preserving bone.

## Abstract

Background: Despite extensive preclinical evidence that statins enhance osteogenesis and the widespread clinical use of platelet-rich fibrin (PRF), the clinical effectiveness of statin-incorporated PRF (SIM-PRF) in limiting peri-implant crestal bone loss remains insufficiently validated. Objectives: To address the mentioned gap, we integrated in vitro assays on human periodontal ligament stem cells (hPDLSCs) with a controlled clinical trial to test whether SIM-PRF reduces early and 12-month marginal bone loss versus PRF alone and PRF with bone graft. Methods: In vitro, cytotoxicity, migration and osteogenic differentiation were assessed, in addition to the effect on basal inflammatory markers. Clinically, 24 immediate-implant cases were randomized to receive PRF, PRF+SIM, or PRF+bone graft, with CBCT-based crestal bone change measured at 0–3, 3–6, and 6–12 months. Results: Flow cytometry confirmed the mesenchymal identity of the isolated hPDLSCs, which exhibited dose-dependent responses to SIM treatment. Lower SIM concentrations (0.1 μM) enhanced osteogenic differentiation, as evidenced by increased mineralization, alkaline phosphatase activity, and expression of osteogenic markers (RUNX2 and osteocalcin), while maintaining cell viability and migration. Both SIM concentrations (0.1 μM and 1 μM) significantly reduced basal pro-inflammatory cytokine expression (TNF-α and IL-6). Radiographic analysis revealed significantly reduced crestal bone loss (p < 0.001) in the PRF-SIM and PRF-Bone groups compared to PRF alone, particularly during early postoperative intervals (0–3 and 3–6 months). Notably, no significant difference was observed between the PRF-SIM and PRF-Bone groups (p > 0.05) in preserving the peri-implant bone. Conclusions: These findings highlight the potential of SIM-loaded PRF as an effective, biocompatible, and patient-friendly approach to enhance bone regeneration and implant success.