# Questionnaire on Nursing Competencies in Nutritional Care for Chronic Kidney Patients: Development and Validation

## TL;DR

This paper introduces a validated questionnaire to assess and improve nursing competencies in nutritional care for patients with end-stage renal disease.

## Contribution

The study presents a newly developed and validated tool (NECN-ESRD) to evaluate nursing knowledge and practices in nutritional care for chronic kidney patients.

## Key findings

- The NECN-ESRD questionnaire has a four-factor structure with strong psychometric properties.
- The tool showed excellent internal consistency and test-retest reliability.
- The questionnaire is stable across different nurse education and experience levels.

## Abstract

Background/Objectives: Nutritional management is central to the care of patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD), yet malnutrition often remains under-recognized due to gaps in nursing knowledge and competencies. This study aimed to develop and validate the Nursing Education and Competencies in Nutrition for Patients with CKD in ESRD (NECN-ESRD) questionnaire, designed to assess nephrology nurses’ competencies, attitudes, and practices in nutritional care. Methods: A methodological and cross-sectional design was adopted, following the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) recommendations for instrument development. The process comprised five phases: construct definition and item generation, expert consultation and revision, quantitative content validity analysis, pilot testing, and psychometric testing. Data were collected between August and September 2025 from 405 nephrology nurses across Italy. Exploratory Factor Analyses (EFAs) and Confirmatory Factor Analyses (CFAs) were conducted on split samples (60/40), and key psychometric properties were evaluated. Results: EFA identified a four-factor structure—Recommendations, Attitudes, Practice, and Advanced Competencies—which was confirmed through CFA with good fit indices [Comparative Fit Index (CFI) = 0.995, Tucker–Lewis Index (TLI) = 0.994, Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA) = 0.07]. A higher-order model further improved fit (CFI = 0.994, RMSEA = 0.029), explaining 68.2% of variance. Internal consistency was excellent (ω = 0.89–0.96), test–retest reliability showed perfect agreement [Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) = 1.00], and invariance testing supported equivalence across educational and experience levels. Conclusions: The NECN-ESRD demonstrated strong validity, reliability, and stability, providing a robust and context-specific tool to assess and enhance nurses’ competencies in nutritional care for ESRD patients. Its application can support targeted educational interventions, improve clinical practice, and contribute to enhancing the quality of nutritional care for patients with ESRD within healthcare systems.