# Tuning Supramolecular Structure in Trimethylglycine Cocrystals: Competition Between Hydrogen and Halogen Bonding upon Cl/Br Substitution

**Authors:** Andrei V. Churakov, Alexander G. Medvedev, Anastasia V. Shishkina, Nikita E. Frolov, Mikhail V. Vener

PMC · DOI: 10.3390/molecules31061047 · Molecules · 2026-03-21

## TL;DR

This paper explores how substituting chlorine with bromine in trimethylglycine cocrystals changes the supramolecular structure through hydrogen and halogen bonding.

## Contribution

The study reveals how Cl/Br substitution alters the energy hierarchy and supramolecular packing in trimethylglycine cocrystals.

## Key findings

- TMG molecules form dimers in the dichlorophenol cocrystal via strong hydrogen bonds.
- Bromine substitution leads to a catemeric motif with TMG molecules forming infinite chains.
- Hydrogen and halogen bonding energies shift significantly with Cl/Br substitution.

## Abstract

Two novel cocrystals of zwitterionic trimethylglycine (TMG) with 2,6-dichlorophenol [TMG•2,6-dichlorophenol] (1:1) and 2,6-dibromophenol [TMG•2,6-dibromophenol] (1:2) are synthesized and structurally characterized using single crystal X-ray diffraction. To estimate the energy of various intermolecular interactions, periodic DFT calculations were performed followed by Bader analysis of the crystalline electron density. TMG molecules form dimers in [TMG•2,6-dichlorophenol] (1:1). Its supramolecular structure is governed by the primary charge-assisted H-bonds (~60 kJ/mol) and supported by C–H∙∙∙O contacts (~12 kJ/mol). Cl/Br substitution introduces a more potent halogen-bonding donor. The Br∙∙∙O− interaction (~10 kJ/mol) is strong enough to reorganize the packing into a catemeric motif. As a result, TMG molecules form infinite chains in [TMG•2,6-dibromophenol] (1:2). This illustrates that “fine tuning” is not merely about changing distances, but about shifting the entire energy hierarchy of the crystal. Two-dimensional fingerprint diagrams (2D diagrams) obtained from the Hirshfeld surface and Bader’s analysis of the crystalline electron density give significantly different values of the contributions of the H∙∙∙H contacts, 28% vs. 5% respectively. The main reason for this discrepancy is the large number of relatively short intermolecular H∙∙∙H contacts without a critical bond point in trimethylglycine cocrystals.

## Linked entities

- **Chemicals:** trimethylglycine (PubChem CID 247), 2,6-dichlorophenol (PubChem CID 6899), 2,6-dibromophenol (PubChem CID 11847)

## Full-text entities

- **Chemicals:** C (MESH:D002244), O (MESH:D010100), TMG 2,6-dibromophenol (-), Br (MESH:D001966), H (MESH:D006859), 2,6-dibromophenol (MESH:C038964), Halogen (MESH:D006219), 2,6-dichlorophenol (MESH:C032729), Cl (MESH:D002713), TMG (MESH:D001622)

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC13028978/full.md

## Figures

5 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC13028978/full.md

## References

89 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC13028978/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC13028978