# Optimization of Forward Osmosis for Oil Refinery Effluent Desalination Using Response Surface Methodology

**Authors:** Elorm Obotey Ezugbe, Sudesh Rathilal, Emmanuel Kweinor Tetteh

PMC · DOI: 10.3390/membranes16030086 · Membranes · 2026-02-28

## TL;DR

This study optimizes forward osmosis for desalinating oil refinery wastewater using statistical methods to improve efficiency and contaminant removal.

## Contribution

The novel use of response surface methodology to optimize FO parameters for oil refinery effluent desalination.

## Key findings

- Optimized FO achieved 94.59% CO32− rejection and 100% SO42− rejection.
- Average permeation flux of 3.64 L/m2 h was achieved under optimal conditions.
- FO membrane showed 86.01% flux recovery after cleaning, indicating its effectiveness.

## Abstract

Repurposing usage of oil refinery wastewater with retrofitted desalination technology necessitates the optimization of a forward osmosis (FO) technology. Herein, factors such as draw solution concentration (DS-C) and feed and draw solution flow rates (FS-FR, DS-FR) play significant roles. In this study, the individualistic and interaction effects of these factors were explored to ascertain the FO performance. The effects of these operating factors, DS-C (20–50 g/L), DS-FR (7.5–9.4 L/h), and FS-FR (7.5–9.4 L/h), and their interactive effects on the permeation flux and rejection of Cl−, SO42− and CO32− from oil refinery effluent, were studied using the Box–Behnken design (BBD) of response surface methodology (RSM). Statistical models were developed to optimize the operating conditions. The analysis of variance and the developed response models were used to evaluate the data at a 95% confidence level. Three confirmatory runs were conducted based on the optimum conditions (FS-FR: 9.2 L/h; DS-FR: 9.4 L/h; DS-C: 32.6 g/L). At a desirability of 81%, average rejections of 94.59 ± 0.32% for CO32− and 100% for SO42− were obtained. Average Cl− enrichment was 35.5 ± 5.15% and average permeation flux of 3.64 ± 0.13 L/m2 h were achieved, suggesting that RSM was a suitable tool for optimizing FO for desalinating the effluent. In addition, the average recovered permeation flux of 86.01 ± 2.66% demonstrated the effectiveness of the FO membrane after cleaning.

## Linked entities

- **Chemicals:** Cl− (PubChem CID 312), SO42− (PubChem CID 1117), CO32− (PubChem CID 769)

## Full-text entities

- **Genes:** RNASE3 (ribonuclease A family member 3) [NCBI Gene 6037] {aka ECP, RAF1, RNS3}
- **Diseases:** injury to (MESH:D014947), RSD (MESH:D008228)
- **Chemicals:** chloride (MESH:D002712), ozone (MESH:D010126), Ca2+ (-), polymer (MESH:D011108), sulphate (MESH:D013431), DS (MESH:D003903), TiO2 (MESH:C009495), Chloride ion (MESH:D002713), FR (MESH:D005605), OH* (MESH:C031356), salt (MESH:D012492), Oil (MESH:D009821), carbonate (MESH:D002254), FS (MESH:D005461), hydroxyl radicals (MESH:D017665), CTA (MESH:C024671), NaCl (MESH:D012965), H2O. (MESH:D014867), CO2 (MESH:D002245), alginate (MESH:D000464)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]
- **Mutations:** AC > A, A > C2, C > AC, A2 > A

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC13028418/full.md

## Figures

13 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC13028418/full.md

## References

60 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC13028418/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC13028418