# Teachers’ Self-Efficacy in Dyscalculia: Development and Psychometric Validation of a New Scale

**Authors:** Gülçin Oflaz, Kübra Polat, Yılmaz Mutlu, Zekeriya Çam

PMC · DOI: 10.3390/jintelligence14030050 · Journal of Intelligence · 2026-03-18

## TL;DR

This study created and validated a new scale to measure teachers' confidence in handling dyscalculia, a learning difficulty with math.

## Contribution

The study introduces a new, validated scale for measuring teachers' self-efficacy in addressing dyscalculia.

## Key findings

- The Dyscalculia Self-Efficacy Scale (DSES) consists of 34 items grouped into four factors.
- The DSES showed strong construct validity and high internal consistency.
- The scale demonstrated convergent and discriminant validity through correlation analyses.

## Abstract

The aim of this study is to develop a valid and reliable scale for measuring the self-efficacy of primary school and mathematics teachers regarding dyscalculia. Grounded in Bandura’s Social Cognitive Theory, the study followed established scale development procedures. In the initial phase, a pool of 42 items was generated to assess teachers’ self-efficacy regarding dyscalculia. The items were reviewed by a panel of seven experts in the fields of psychometrics, mathematics education, special education, and psychology to ensure content validity. Based on expert evaluations, four items were removed due to overly technical phrasing that could lead to misinterpretation, reducing the pool to 38 items. Subsequently, Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) conducted with 273 teachers indicated that four additional items exhibited inadequate factor loadings or problematic cross-loadings; these items were also excluded. The resulting Dyscalculia Self-Efficacy Scale (DSES) comprises 34 items organized into four factors: “Dyscalculia Symptoms”, “Providing Psychological Support to Children with Dyscalculia”, “Diagnosing Dyscalculia”, “Providing Support in the Teaching Process”. Confirmatory Factor Analysis conducted with a separate sample of 242 teachers yielded strong model fit indices, supporting the construct validity of the scale. The overall scale demonstrated high internal consistency (Cronbach’s α = 0.980, McDonald’s ω = 0.980). Correlation analyses with established instruments provided evidence of convergent and discriminant validity. The findings indicate that the DSES is a valid and reliable instrument for assessing teachers’ self-efficacy regarding dyscalculia.

## Linked entities

- **Diseases:** dyscalculia (MONDO:0001552)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** dyslexia (MESH:D004410), number blindness (MESH:D001766), loss (MESH:D016388), mathematical disability (MESH:D009069), Burnout (MESH:D002055), functional (MESH:D003291), SLDs (MESH:D000067559), deficit in mathematical skills (MESH:D019957), Developmental dyscalculia (MESH:D060705), impairments in language, memory, or spatial processing (MESH:D008569), anxiety (MESH:D001007), attention problems (MESH:D001289), mathematical failure (MESH:D051437), sensory impairments (MESH:D012678), number sense difficulty (MESH:D020886), neurodevelopmental disorder (MESH:D002658), injury to (MESH:D014947), arithmetic learning difficulty (MESH:D007859), cognitive deficits (MESH:D003072)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC13028139/full.md

## References

104 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC13028139/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC13028139