# Multi-Type Weld Defect Detection in Galvanized Sheet MIG Welding Using an Improved YOLOv10 Model

**Authors:** Bangzhi Xiao, Yadong Yang, Yinshui He, Guohong Ma

PMC · DOI: 10.3390/ma19061178 · Materials · 2026-03-17

## TL;DR

This paper introduces YOLO-MIG, an improved YOLOv10 model for detecting weld defects in galvanized sheet MIG welding under challenging industrial conditions.

## Contribution

The novel contribution is the development of YOLO-MIG with three architectural modifications for efficient and accurate weld defect detection in real-world settings.

## Key findings

- YOLO-MIG achieves 98.4% mAP@0.5 and 56.29% mAP@0.5:0.95 on a workshop-collected dataset.
- The model is lightweight with 1.83 M parameters and 3.87 MB FP16 weights.
- YOLO-MIG outperforms YOLOv10n in accuracy while reducing model size and computational cost.

## Abstract

Shop-floor weld inspection may appear to be a solved problem until a camera is deployed near a galvanized-sheet MIG welding line. The seam reflects light, the texture changes from frame to frame, and the defects of interest are often small and visually subtle. Additionally, the hardware near the line is rarely a data-center GPU. With those constraints in mind, this paper presents YOLO-MIG, a compact detector built on YOLOv10n for weld-seam inspection in practical production conditions. We make three focused changes to the baseline: a C2f-EMSCP backbone block to better preserve weak defect cues with modest parameter growth, a BiFPN neck to keep small-target information alive during feature fusion, and a C2fCIB head to clean up predictions that otherwise get distracted by seam edges and illumination artifacts. On a workshop-collected dataset containing 326 original images, with the training subset expanded through augmentation to 2608 labeled samples in total, YOLO-MIG achieves 98.4% mAP@0.5 and 56.29% mAP@0.5:0.95 on the test set while remaining lightweight (1.83 M parameters, 3.87 MB FP16 weights). Compared with YOLOv10n, the proposed model improves mAP@0.5 by 9.36 points and mAP@0.5:0.95 by 4.89 points, while reducing parameters, GFLOPs, and model size by 43.4%, 19.9%, and 29.9%, respectively. The results suggest that YOLO-MIG is not only accurate but also realistic to deploy at the edge for intelligent weld quality control.

## Full-text entities

- **Chemicals:** YOLO (-)

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC13028109/full.md

## Figures

13 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC13028109/full.md

## References

42 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC13028109/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC13028109