# Integrating Finite Element Simulation with Actual GTAW Weld Profiles to Optimize Root Height in Stainless Steel 316L Pipe Joints

## TL;DR

This paper uses simulations and experiments to determine the optimal weld root height in stainless steel pipes to reduce stress and improve structural performance.

## Contribution

The study introduces a stress-based criterion for weld root reinforcement in stainless steel pipelines using integrated finite element analysis and experimental validation.

## Key findings

- Reinforcement heights exceeding 2.0 mm increase stress gradients and shift peak stresses toward the weld toe under drag-inclusive loading.
- Reinforcement ≤2 mm provides smoother load transfer and reduced stiffness discontinuity across the weld interface.
- A stress-informed upper limit of 2 mm for weld root reinforcement is recommended for thin-walled stainless-steel pipelines.

## Abstract

Weld root reinforcement is a critical geometric parameter governing stress concentration and structural performance in thin-walled stainless-steel piping systems designed to ASME B31.3. While current codes specify permissible dimensional limits, they do not explicitly quantify how incremental variations in root height influence stress distribution under realistic service loading conditions. This study integrates finite element analysis (FEA) with experimentally validated GTAW weld profiles to evaluate the structural influence of weld root height in 316L stainless-steel pipe joints. An experimentally manufactured 4 in schedule 10S joint with a measured root height of less than 1.5 mm was adopted as the baseline geometry. Additional models with reinforcement heights of 1.138, 2.0, 2.5, and 3.0 mm were evaluated under two representative load cases: (i) internal pressure combined with drag and axial thrust (LC-1), and (ii) internal pressure with thrust only (LC-2). The results demonstrate that reinforcement heights exceeding 2.0 mm increase von Mises, hoop, longitudinal, and radial stress gradients, with peak stresses shifting toward the weld toe under drag-inclusive loading. In contrast, reinforcement ≤2 mm provides smoother load transfer and reduced stiffness discontinuity across the weld interface. The combined numerical and experimental findings support a stress-informed upper limit of 2 mm for weld root reinforcement in thin-walled stainless-steel pipelines, offering a performance-based complement to existing dimensional acceptance criteria.