# The Effect of Surface Pretreatments on the Bond Strength of Hybrid CAD/CAM with Composite Elevation

**Authors:** Mehmet Ali Fildisi, Burcu Oglakci Ozkoc, Zumrut Ceren Ozduman, Evrim Eliguzeloglu Dalkilic

PMC · DOI: 10.3390/jfb17030157 · Journal of Functional Biomaterials · 2026-03-23

## TL;DR

This study examines how different surface treatments affect the bond strength of dental restorations made with CAD/CAM materials to either dentin or composite surfaces.

## Contribution

The study introduces a comparison of surface pretreatment effects on bond strength in simulated clinical scenarios involving composite elevation.

## Key findings

- Sandblasting and hydrofluoric acid treatments showed higher bond strength to dentin than to composite surfaces.
- Untreated surfaces had significantly lower bond strength compared to treated ones.
- Cohesive failures were more common in sandblasted dentin, while adhesive failures dominated in other groups.

## Abstract

In computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) restorations for severely damaged teeth, the cavity floor or proximal margins may be elevated with composite resin to improve adhesion. This in vitro study investigated how different surface pretreatment methods affect the shear bond strength (SBS) of hybrid CAD/CAM materials to dentin or composite surfaces, simulating clinical situations of composite elevation. Hybrid CAD/CAM samples were bonded to dentin or composite substrates following different surface pretreatment protocols and cemented using a dual-cure adhesive resin cement. The samples were thermocycled and subjected to shear bond strength testing, and failure modes were analyzed. The SBS in the sandblasting (SB)+Dentin group and hydrofluoric acid (HF)+Dentin was significantly higher than that in the SB+Composite and HF+Composite groups (p < 0.05). Untreated+composite and untreated+dentin groups showed significantly lower SBS (p < 0.05). Failure mode analysis revealed a predominance of cohesive failures in the SB+Dentin group, while adhesive failures were more frequently observed in most of the other groups. SB-treated and HF-etched hybrid CAD/CAM materials showed more favorable bonding behavior to dentin than to composite, highlighting that bonding to the elevated composite layer may be less effective than bonding directly to prepared dentin.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** fracture (MESH:D050723), caries (MESH:D003731), tooth tissue loss (MESH:D016388), injury to (MESH:D014947), cervical (MESH:D002575)
- **Chemicals:** saline (MESH:D012965), Ultradent Porcelain Etch (MESH:C092419), gold (MESH:D006046), isopropyl alcohol (MESH:D019840), water (MESH:D014867), Al2O3 (MESH:D000537), silica (MESH:D012822), HF (MESH:D006858), HEMA (MESH:C005044), methacrylate (MESH:D008689), acrylic resin (MESH:D000180), barium (MESH:D001464), BISGMA (MESH:D017438), oxides (MESH:D010087), CAM (-), polymer (MESH:D011108), silane (MESH:D012821), DMA (MESH:C405765), CAD (MESH:C075764), urethane-dimethacrylate (MESH:C029824)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC13028005/full.md

## Figures

4 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC13028005/full.md

## References

38 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC13028005/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC13028005