Modified Formulations of Silicate-Based Cements: Comparative Study of Physicochemical Properties
Mirlyn de Souza Dias, Raimundo Sales de Oliveira Neto, Marcelo Antônio Santos da Silva, Suyane Maria Luna-Cruz, Murilo Priori Alcalde, Rodrigo Ricci Vivan, Antônio Sérgio Bezerra Sombra, Marco Antônio Húngaro Duarte, Pierre Basilio Almeida Fechine, Bruno Carvalho de Vasconcelos

TL;DR
New cement formulations with zirconium or strontium phosphate show good performance and could replace traditional dental cements.
Contribution
The study introduces new calcium silicate-based cements with zirconium or strontium phosphate that meet or exceed industry standards without radiopacifiers.
Findings
The new cements exceeded ISO radiopacity requirements without radiopacifiers.
SPS formulation had a significantly longer final setting time compared to CZS.
Both formulations showed sustained calcium/strontium ion release and maintained an alkaline pH.
Abstract
What are the main findings? The experimental cements exhibited adequate physicochemical performance.The radiopacity exceeded the ISO requirements without the need for radiopacifiers.The setting time improved compared with previous formulations.The solubility remained within acceptable limits.An alkaline pH and sustained calcium/strontium ion release were observed. The experimental cements exhibited adequate physicochemical performance. The radiopacity exceeded the ISO requirements without the need for radiopacifiers. The setting time improved compared with previous formulations. The solubility remained within acceptable limits. An alkaline pH and sustained calcium/strontium ion release were observed. What are the implications of the main findings? Calcium silicate-based cements with zirconium or strontium phosphate may reduce the need for radiopacifiers.Formulations show potential…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsEndodontics and Root Canal Treatments · Concrete and Cement Materials Research · Building materials and conservation
