Scaling Surface-Guided Radiation Therapy to Larger Lung Cancer Cohorts: Frameless Immobilization and Enhanced Setup Accuracy

TL;DR

This study shows that surface-guided radiation therapy works well for lung cancer treatment with high accuracy and minimal errors in a large patient group.

Contribution

The study evaluates SGRT's clinical utility in a large lung cancer cohort under frameless conditions.

Findings

SGRT showed high setup accuracy with negligible systematic errors in all directions.

Dice Similarity Coefficient values indicated excellent spatial agreement between planned and actual tumor volumes.

Residual setup errors were mostly within ±1 mm, and CTV volume changes were minimal.

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the setup accuracy and intrafractional geometric stability of surface-guided radiation therapy (SGRT) under frameless immobilization in lung cancer radiotherapy and to assess its clinical utility in a relatively large patient cohort. Materials and Methods: A total of 678 treatment fractions from 52 patients with primary non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), treated between October 2024 and November 2025, were retrospectively analyzed. Patient setup was performed using SGRT with the Identify system, and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) served as the reference for internal target localization Intrafractional setup displacements, center-of-mass (COM) shifts, residual setup errors, and intrafractional clinical target volume (CTV) variations were evaluated. Spatial agreement between planned and intrafractional tumor volumes was quantified using the Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC). Results: The mean CBCT-based intrafractional shifts were −0.01 mm (vertical), 0.03 mm (longitudinal), and 0.01 mm (lateral), indicating negligible systematic errors. The greatest variability was observed in the longitudinal direction (standard deviation, 1.32 mm), with a maximum displacement of 4.58 mm. COM-based analysis demonstrated near-zero mean displacements in all directions, with standard deviations ranging from 0.01 to 0.02 mm. DSC values ranged from 0.91 to 0.98, with a mean of 0.96, indicating excellent spatial agreement between planned and intrafractional tumor volumes. Residual setup errors were predominantly within ±1 mm, and the mean intrafractional CTV volume change was minimal (0.27 cm3). Conclusions: SGRT-based frameless lung cancer radiotherapy demonstrated high setup accuracy and robust intrafractional geometric stability. Although slightly greater variability was observed in the longitudinal direction, overall positional deviations and volumetric changes remained within clinically acceptable limits. These findings support the feasibility of integrating SGRT with CBCT-guided radiotherapy and suggest potential benefits for workflow efficiency and planning target volume margin optimization.

Figures