# Real-World Impact of Initial Dual Bronchodilation on Exercise Physiological Response and Health-Related Quality of Life in Newly Diagnosed, Treatment-Naïve Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

## TL;DR

This study shows that starting COPD patients on dual bronchodilation improves their exercise capacity and quality of life within 12 weeks.

## Contribution

The study provides real-world evidence that initial dual bronchodilation improves exercise physiology and HRQoL in newly diagnosed, treatment-naïve COPD patients.

## Key findings

- COPD patients had significantly lower peak oxygen uptake and oxygen pulse compared to controls.
- Dual bronchodilation improved peak VO2 and oxygen pulse in COPD patients after 12 weeks.
- SF-36 physical functioning and health change scores improved significantly following treatment.

## Abstract

Background and Objectives: Dual bronchodilation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) has demonstrated beneficial effects on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and exercise-related outcomes. Real-world evidence in treatment-naïve COPD remains limited. Materials and Methods: Forty-six COPD patients and 23 age-, gender-, BMI-, and cardiovascular comorbidity–matched controls underwent spirometry, plethysmography, symptom-limited incremental cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET), and the 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36). Following baseline assessment, COPD patients received tiotropium/olodaterol as part of routine practice. Thirty-two patients underwent repeated examinations at 12 weeks. Baseline differences between the COPD and control groups were assessed, and longitudinal changes in pulmonary function, CPET, and SF-36 were evaluated in COPD patients. Results: Compared with controls, COPD patients had lower peak oxygen uptake (VO2; 17.4 ± 4.4 vs. 22.8 ± 4.5 mL/kg/min, p < 0.001) and oxygen pulse (11.5 ± 3.5 vs. 14.0 ± 2.4 mL/beat, p = 0.003), failed to reach 80% of predicted values, and exhibited worse ventilatory efficiency (p < 0.001). SF-36 scores in the COPD group were lower across all domains. After 12 weeks of tiotropium/olodaterol, pulmonary function improved significantly. CPET was performed at comparable efforts at both visits. Peak VO2 increased from 70 ± 15 to 75 ± 16% predicted (p = 0.044), and peak oxygen pulse from 74 ± 16 to 79 ± 16% predicted (p = 0.015). VE/MVV decreased from 0.77 ± 0.23 to 0.69 ± 0.15 (p = 0.03). Higher baseline VE/MVV predicted a larger improvement after treatment (B = 0.71, p < 0.001), while beta-blocker use had no effect on the change of VE/MVV. SF-36 physical functioning and health change scores improved (both p < 0.01). Conclusions: At diagnosis, COPD was associated with impaired exercise physiology and reduced HRQoL. Dual bronchodilation improved exercise responses and perceived physical functioning. Beta-blocker use was not associated with changes in breathing reserve, supporting the use of cardioselective agents when indicated.