Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: Public-Access Defibrillation and System Approaches to Minimize Avoidable Delay

TL;DR

This paper reviews strategies to reduce delays in responding to out-of-hospital cardiac arrests, focusing on public access to defibrillators and system-level improvements.

Contribution

The paper provides a synthesis of evidence and strategies for optimizing public-access defibrillation and early response systems to improve survival after cardiac arrest.

Findings

Automated external defibrillator (AED) use before EMS arrival significantly improves survival in shockable rhythm cases.

Public-access defibrillation effectiveness is limited by poor placement, low accessibility, and lack of public confidence.

Integrated community systems like Italy's 'Progetto Vita' demonstrate potential for reducing avoidable delays through coordinated AED deployment and responder training.

Abstract

Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) remains a leading cause of sudden death worldwide, with wide variation in reported incidence and outcomes driven by heterogeneity in registries, emergency medical services (EMS) organization, and case definitions. Despite substantial advances in resuscitation systems, survival after EMS-treated OHCA generally remains below 10%, and outcomes are critically time dependent. Delays in emergency call activation, bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), and—most importantly—early defibrillation are associated with a rapid decline in return of spontaneous circulation and favorable neurological recovery. This narrative review synthesizes current evidence and implementation strategies aimed at reducing “time-to-CPR” and “time-to-shock,” with a specific focus on public-access defibrillation (PAD) as a tool to mitigate avoidable delay. Randomized trials and large registry studies consistently demonstrate that automated external defibrillator (AED) use before EMS arrival is a key determinant of survival in patients with shockable rhythms. However, the real-world effectiveness of PAD remains limited by suboptimal AED placement, restricted 24/7 accessibility, low public awareness, and underutilization driven by fear and lack of confidence. We compare different PAD delivery models—including EMS-based, police and first-responder-based, and fully integrated community systems—and summarize evidence supporting targeted, high-yield AED deployment and cost-effectiveness. In addition, we review emerging strategies to reduce avoidable delay and strengthen the early links of the chain of survival, such as school-based training programs, smartphone- and SMS-based citizen-responder networks, improved dispatch recognition of cardiac arrest (including artificial intelligence–supported tools), and drone-enabled AED delivery. Across these approaches, patient benefit critically depends on system integration, alert performance, and true AED accessibility. Finally, we describe the Italian “Progetto Vita” experience as a community-integrated model explicitly designed to minimize avoidable delay through widespread AED deployment, lay responder training, and real-time integration with EMS. We conclude by outlining future priorities, including the development of robust national OHCA registries and scalable solutions for the high burden of cardiac arrests occurring at home, such as population-level deployment of low-cost, ultra-portable AEDs.