Comparative Radiologic Outcomes of Romosozumab and Teriparatide in Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures
Jun-Seok Lee, Geon-U Kim, Ho-Young Jung, Young-Hoon Kim, Sang-Il Kim, Sangjun Park, Young-Yul Kim, Hyung-Youl Park

TL;DR
This study compares romosozumab and teriparatide for treating osteoporotic vertebral fractures, finding similar outcomes but slight advantages for romosozumab in preserving spinal alignment.
Contribution
The study provides a comparative analysis of two anabolic therapies for osteoporotic vertebral fractures using longitudinal radiologic data.
Findings
Romosozumab showed numerically smaller increases in kyphotic angles and less vertebral height loss compared to teriparatide.
Lumbar spine BMD increased more in the romosozumab group than in the teriparatide group.
Disability improvement was greater in the teriparatide group despite similar radiologic outcomes.
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Osteoporotic vertebral fractures (OVFs) are frequently associated with progressive kyphotic deformity and vertebral height loss, adversely affecting spinal alignment and function. Although romosozumab and teriparatide are established anabolic therapies, comparative data on their longitudinal radiologic effects after OVFs remain limited. This study compared radiologic and clinical outcomes between these agents in patients with OVFs. Methods: Sixty-two patients with single-level OVFs were included: 34 patients in the romosozumab group and 28 patients in the teriparatide group, analyzed in a retrospective, observational comparative study. All patients received anabolic therapy for 6 months followed by sequential denosumab. Radiologic parameters (Cobb angle, vertebral wedge angle, and anterior and middle vertebral body heights) were evaluated at baseline and at 1, 3,…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsBone health and osteoporosis research · Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques · Bone and Joint Diseases
