Prescribing Errors and Pharmacist Interventions in Paediatric Primary Health Care in Saudi Arabia: A Mixed-Methods Study

TL;DR

This study finds that nearly a quarter of pediatric prescriptions in Saudi Arabia contain errors, but pharmacists often catch them before harm occurs.

Contribution

The study provides novel insights into prescribing errors in Saudi pediatric primary care and highlights pharmacist interventions.

Findings

26.1% of pediatric prescriptions contained at least one prescribing error.

Dose-related errors were most common, and most errors were intercepted before dispensing.

Pharmacists identified and resolved errors using drug references, dose recalculations, and clinician communication.

Abstract

Background: Medication use in paediatric populations is inherently complex and carries a heightened risk of prescribing errors, particularly within primary health-care settings. Despite this concern, evidence describing paediatric prescribing errors in Saudi Arabia remains scarce. Hence, the present study aimed to evaluate the prevalence and patterns of prescribing errors in paediatric primary care and to characterize the pharmacist-led interventions undertaken to resolve these errors. Methods: A prospective, mixed-methods cross-sectional study was conducted over three months at a primary health-care centre. Paediatric outpatient prescriptions were systematically reviewed during routine practice by trained clinical pharmacists. All suspected errors were independently validated and classified for severity by a multidisciplinary expert panel. Descriptive statistics were used to summarise prescribing errors, and associations with patient and prescription characteristics were assessed using chi-square tests. Qualitative data were analysed using a descriptive thematic approach to explore mechanisms of error identification and the nature of corrective pharmacist interventions. Results: A total of 545 paediatric outpatient prescriptions were reviewed, of which 142 prescriptions (26.1%) contained at least one prescribing error. Across these prescriptions, a total of 145 individual prescribing errors were identified. Dose-related errors were the most common (68.3%), followed by inaccuracies in dosing frequency (11.0%) and inappropriate drug selection (9.0%). The occurrence of prescribing errors was significantly associated with patient weight (p = 0.016), the number of medications per prescription (p < 0.001), and the recorded diagnosis (p = 0.018). The majority of errors were intercepted prior to medication dispensing (93.0%), and no cases of patient harm were identified. Qualitative analysis revealed that errors were predominantly detected through cross-checking with authoritative drug references, recalculation of weight-based doses, and application of clinical judgement, and were most often resolved through direct communication with the prescribing clinician. Conclusions: Prescribing errors occur frequently in paediatric outpatient settings; however, most are preventable with appropriate safeguards. Pharmacists play a critical role in identifying and resolving these errors before they result in patient harm. Enhancing paediatric prescribing support systems and strengthening interprofessional collaboration may further advance medication safety within primary health-care services.