# Effects of Continuous Postoperative Pericardial FLUshing with Investigational Device on Postoperative Re-Explorations for Bleeding (FLUID)—Randomized Clinical Trial

**Authors:** Manon A. Molenaar, Dave R. Koolbergen, Martijn Vegter, Kayan Lam, Frederik N. Hofman, Stefan R. van Dinter, Annette van ‘t Loo, Arend de Weger, Jeroen A. Janson, Carolien S. E. Bulte, Susanne Eberl, Wim K. Lagrand, Alexander Vonk, Felice R. M. Lucas, Robert J. M. Klautz, Marcus J. Schultz

PMC · DOI: 10.3390/jcm15062151 · Journal of Clinical Medicine · 2026-03-11

## TL;DR

A clinical trial found that continuous postoperative pericardial flushing did not reduce re-explorations for bleeding or tamponade in cardiac surgery patients.

## Contribution

This is the first randomized clinical trial to evaluate the effectiveness of continuous pericardial flushing in reducing postoperative re-explorations.

## Key findings

- CPPF did not reduce re-explorations for cardiac tamponade or bleeding compared to standard care.
- The study was stopped early with no significant difference between the groups (3.8% vs. 2.4%).
- No safety issues were observed with the investigational device used for CPPF.

## Abstract

Objectives: Continuous postoperative pericardial flushing (CPPF) may prevent postoperative re-explorations for tamponade or excessive postoperative bleeding due to a non-surgical cause in cardiac surgery patients. Methods: An investigator-initiated, national, multicenter, randomized clinical superiority trial was performed in four hospitals in the Netherlands between November 2021 and April 2023. Patients undergoing general cardiac surgery involving cardiopulmonary bypass were randomly assigned to receive CPPF or standard care. The primary endpoint was the number of surgical re-explorations for either cardiac tamponade or excessive postoperative bleeding due to a non-surgical cause in the first postoperative week. Results: The study was stopped after randomization of 164 patients, of which 79 were allocated to CPPF and 85 served as controls. The number of surgical re-explorations for either cardiac tamponade or excessive postoperative bleeding due to a non-surgical cause in the first postoperative week was not different between CPPF patients and control patients (3.8% vs. 2.4%; relative risk 1.61 [0.28–9.41]; p = 0.67). There were no safety issues related to use of the investigational device. Conclusions: In this prematurely stopped study, CPPF did not reduce the number of postoperative re-explorations for cardiac tamponade or excessive bleeding due to a non-surgical cause in cardiac surgery patients. Additional well-powered studies remain needed to determine whether CPPF has any beneficial effect on outcome.

## Linked entities

- **Diseases:** cardiac tamponade (MONDO:0001297)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** CPPF (MESH:D005483), Bleeding (MESH:D006470), cardiac tamponade (MESH:D002305)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC13026474/full.md

## Figures

1 figure with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC13026474/full.md

## References

25 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC13026474/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC13026474